Premium

After pulling up Jharkhand HC, Supreme Court now tells all HCs to list cases where verdict reserved but pending

The top court also took note of a May 5 report by The Indian Express which said that the Jharkhand High Court had pronounced judgments in 75 criminal appeals in a single week after a rap from the Supreme Court on April 23 for reserving verdicts in criminal appeals without pronouncing them.

After pulling up Jharkhand HC, SC now tells all HCs to list cases where verdict reserved but pendingThe court has now asked the Jharkhand HC about the fate of the criminal appeals filed by the four petitioners.

The Supreme Court Monday directed the Registrar Generals of all High Courts to submit within four weeks a report detailing cases where judgments have been reserved on or before January 31 but have not been pronounced yet.

The top court also took note of a May 5 report by The Indian Express which said that the Jharkhand High Court had pronounced judgments in 75 criminal appeals in a single week after a rap from the Supreme Court on April 23 for reserving verdicts in criminal appeals without pronouncing them.

In the week preceding the SC rap, as The Indian Express reported, the Jharkhand HC had pronounced 16 verdicts.

On Monday, a division bench of Justices Surya Kant and N K Singh said that reports from all the High Court Registrar Generals “shall contain the Criminal Appeals and Civil Matters separately with a further specification as to whether it is a Division Bench Matter or a Single Bench Matter.”

“The composition of Benches shall also be disclosed. The Registrar General of the High Courts shall furnish the requisite information within four weeks,” it said.

The SC also took on record The Indian Express report, ‘After SC rap, HC decides 75 criminal appeals in a week’, and took cognisance of it. “The news item published in the newspaper – Indian Express, dated 05.05.2025, be kept on record,” the bench directed.

The bench also directed the Registrar General of the Jharkhand HC to furnish the list of the 75 criminal appeals where it had pronounced judgments. It said the list “shall indicate the date(s) when the judgments were reserved along with soft copies of the judgments pronounced by the High Court”.

Story continues below this ad

The top court’s April 23 direction came while it was hearing a petition by four convicts who said judgments in their appeals against conviction were pending for over three years. The SC had directed the Jharkhand HC’s Registrar General to furnish details of cases where judgment was reserved more than two months ago.

Meanwhile, going through the Jharkhand HC report, which was furnished in a sealed cover, the court recorded in its order that “there are 56 matters, including some Criminal Appeals, where a learned Division Bench of the (Jharkhand) High Court has finally heard the matters on different dates ranging from 04.01.2022 till 16.12.2024 but the final pronouncements are still awaited. There are 11 Single Bench Matters also before another Hon’ble Judge where the judgments are reserved on different dates between 25.07.2024 to 27.09.2024.”

“However, the list of 56 matters, sent by the Registrar General of the Jharkhand High Court, does not contain the Criminal Appeals filed by the petitioners.”

The court has now asked the Jharkhand HC about the fate of the criminal appeals filed by the four petitioners.

Story continues below this ad

These four are in prison on charges ranging from murder, rape and under the Arms Act, with incarceration spanning over a decade, and over 16 years in the case of one convict. The petitioners had also submitted before the SC that apart from them, there are 10 other convicts in the same situation before the Jharkhand HC whose appeals have been heard but judgments have not been pronounced “for approximately three years”.

The court will hear the case on July 31. It posted the matters for consideration of bail to the four petitioners to May 13.

It has additionally directed the Jharkhand State Legal Services Authority to “ensure that appropriate proceedings are initiated in all the 10 matters,” for the purpose of seeking suspension of their sentence and consequently, to seek their release on bail during the pendency of their appeals.

It also directed the state body “to take immediate necessary steps to provide legal assistance…and ensure that the convicts like the petitioners are not left remediless”.

Sohini Ghosh is a Senior Correspondent at The Indian Express. Previously based in Ahmedabad covering Gujarat, she recently moved to the New Delhi bureau, where she primarily covers legal developments at the Delhi High Court Professional Profile Background: An alumna of the Asian College of Journalism (ACJ), she previously worked with ET NOW before joining The Indian Express. Core Beats: Her reporting is currently centered on the Delhi High Court, with a focus on high-profile constitutional disputes, disputes over intellectual property, criminal and civil cases, issues of human rights and regulatory law (especially in the areas of technology and healthcare). Earlier Specialty: In Gujarat, she was known for her rigorous coverage in the beats of crime, law and policy, and social justice issues, including the 2002 riot cases, 2008 serial bomb blast case, 2016 flogging of Dalits in Una, among others. She has extensively covered health in the state, including being part of the team that revealed the segregation of wards at the state’s largest government hospital on lines of faith in April 2020. With Ahmedabad being a UNESCO heritage city, she has widely covered urban development and heritage issues, including the redevelopment of the Sabarmati Ashram Recent Notable Articles (Late 2025) Her recent reporting from the Delhi High Court covers major political, constitutional, corporate, and public-interest legal battles: High-Profile Case Coverage She has extensively covered the various legal battles - including for compensation under the aegis of North East Delhi Riots Claims Commission - pertaining to the 2020 northeast Delhi riots, as well as 1984 anti-Sikh riots. She has also led coverage at the intersection of technology and governance, and its impact on the citizenry, from, and beyond courtrooms — such as the government’s stakeholder consultations for framing AI-Deepfake policy. Signature Style Sohini is recognized for her sustained reporting from courtrooms and beyond. She specialises in breaking down dense legal arguments to make legalese accessible for readers. Her transition from Gujarat to Delhi has seen her expand her coverage on regulatory, corporate and intellectual property law, while maintaining a strong commitment to human rights and lacuna in the criminal justice system. X (Twitter): @thanda_ghosh ... Read More

Stay updated with the latest - Click here to follow us on Instagram

Advertisement
Loading Recommendations...
Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments