Adani lawyers seek time until January 30 to update US court on talks with SEC
In April 2025, the law ministry turned down the SEC’s request on the ground that the authenticity of the documents could not be verified as “the forwarding letter bears no seal & signature and the Model Form bears no seal of the requesting authority as well.”
Lawyers representing Gautam and Sagar Adani have sought time until January 30 from the US court for reporting the status of their discussion with the US securities regulator on its motion seeking service of summons through email.
On January 22, the day after the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) filed a motion for an order authorizing Alternative Service Methods, New York law firm Sullivan and Cromwell LLP contacted the SEC on behalf of the Adanis to discuss the matter.
The next day, the Adani lawyers requested the Court for the Eastern District of New York to defer its ruling on the SEC’s motion pending their parley with the US regulator. The court ordered the parties to provide an update on their discussions by January 26.
Responding to this order, the Adani lawyers filed an update on January 26, seeking time until January 30.
“Counsel for the parties have exchanged comments on the stipulation, and counsel for Defendants are continuing to discuss the stipulation with their clients, both of whom are located in India. Counsel for the parties fully expect to finalize the stipulation shortly, and, in light of the time difference with India, we will file it by no later than the morning of Friday, January 30,” the latest filing by Sullivan and Cromwell LLP said.
The New York court has accepted the request.
On January 21, the SEC sought court permission to serve notices via email, following its unsuccessful attempts to serve defendants Gautam and Sagar Adani under the Hague Convention.
As reported by The Indian Express, India’s Ministry of Law and Justice twice declined to formally serve summons issued by the SEC on Gautam and Sagar Adani, citing technical and legal objections.
In April 2025, the law ministry turned down the SEC’s request on the ground that the authenticity of the documents could not be verified as “the forwarding letter bears no seal & signature and the Model Form bears no seal of the requesting authority as well.”
After the SEC countered that the Hague Convention does not mandate such formalities and resubmitted the documents, the law ministry again denied service of summons citing US law.
“The documents have been checked and in view of the Rule 5(b) of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)’s Informal and Other Procedures, 17 C.F.R. § 202.5(b), it is found that the above mentioned summon does not cover in the above said categories. Therefore, the same is returned herewith,” the ministry wrote back last December.
In its motion before the New York court, the SEC pointed out that the “objection has no basis in the (Hague) Convention, which governs service procedures, not the SEC’s underlying authority to bring enforcement actions.”
Story continues below this ad
In November 2024, the SEC filed civil charges, alleging that Gautam and Sagar Adani were engaged in a bribery scheme during a September 2021 note offering by Adani Green that raised $750 million, including approximately $175 million from US investors.
The Adani group has repeatedly dismissed the SEC’s allegations as baseless, adding that it will seek all possible legal recourse.
In a filing to the stock exchanges last Friday, Adani Green Energy said, “The Company is not a party to these proceedings, and no charges have been brought against it. Further, as clarified in our intimation to the stock exchanges dated November 27, 2024 (1:16:32hrs), the Defendants have not been charged with violation/(s) of the United States Foreign Corrupt Practices Act i.e. there are no charges of bribery or corruption against the Defendants. The SEC proceedings are civil in nature.”
Jay Mazoomdaar is an investigative reporter focused on offshore finance, equitable growth, natural resources management and biodiversity conservation. Over two decades, his work has been recognised by the International Press Institute, the Ramnath Goenka Foundation, the Commonwealth Press Union, the Prem Bhatia Memorial Trust, the Asian College of Journalism etc.
Expertise and Experience
Mazoomdaar’s major investigations include the extirpation of tigers in Sariska, global offshore probes such as Panama Papers, Robert Vadra’s land deals in Rajasthan, India’s dubious forest cover data, Vyapam deaths in Madhya Pradesh, mega projects flouting clearance conditions, Nitin Gadkari’s link to e-rickshaws, India shifting stand on ivory ban to fly in African cheetahs, the loss of indigenous cow breeds, the hydel rush in Arunachal Pradesh, land mafias inside Corbett, the JDY financial inclusion scheme, an iron ore heist in Odisha, highways expansion through the Kanha-Pench landscape etc. ... Read More