Premium
This is an archive article published on September 30, 2024

SC grants interim protection from arrest to Malayalam actor Siddique in rape case

Actor Siddique, who has been accused of raping an actress in 2016, had challenged a September 24 Kerala High Court order dismissing his bail plea.

Malayalam film actor Sidhique. (File Photo)Malayalam film actor Sidhique. (File Photo)

The Supreme Court on Monday granted interim protection from arrest to Malayalam actor Siddique in a rape case lodged against him by an actress.

A bench of Justices Bela M Trivedi and Satish Chandra Sharma issued notice on his plea challenging the September 24 order of the Kerala High Court dismissing his bail plea.

The case against Siddique arose in the wake of the Justice Hema Committee report on sexual harassment and gender inequality against women in Malayalam cinema.

Last month, the complainant, a young actor, had raised the allegation through the media, following the release of the report. Consequently, Siddique was forced to step down as the general secretary of the actors’ outfit Association of Malayalam Movie Artistes (AMMA).

Subsequently, the woman filed a complaint with Thiruvananthapuram city police and an FIR was registered under sections 376 (rape) and 506 (criminal intimidation) of the Indian Penal Code. According to the complaint, the alleged crime occurred in 2016 at a Thiruvananthapuram hotel. The police had collected various pieces of evidence from hotel records which prima facie substantiated the woman’s allegation.

Siddique has denied the allegations, calling it a “criminal conspiracy to tarnish the reputation of the entire Malayalam film industry”.

After the Hema committee report was released last month, a couple of women had filed sexual harassment or rape cases against various professionals in the film industry. Except for Siddique, all of them got anticipatory bail.

Story continues below this ad

The actor contended before the Kerala High Court that the delay in FIR registration was fatal but the high court said that that cannot be a ground for scrapping the entire complaint.

“Whether the survivor’s above explanation is plausible will have to be ultimately evaluated and decided after a full-fledged trial. Nevertheless, the contention that the above delay vitiates the entire prosecution case is not a ground for scraping the complaint, particularly while considering a bail application. Victims of sexual abuse and assault may experience psychological, emotional and social barriers that feed the delay in reporting the matter, which necessarily has to be understood in the context of the trauma,” the high court said.

Ananthakrishnan G. is a Senior Assistant Editor with The Indian Express. He has been in the field for over 23 years, kicking off his journalism career as a freelancer in the late nineties with bylines in The Hindu. A graduate in law, he practised in the District judiciary in Kerala for about two years before switching to journalism. His first permanent assignment was with The Press Trust of India in Delhi where he was assigned to cover the lower courts and various commissions of inquiry. He reported from the Delhi High Court and the Supreme Court of India during his first stint with The Indian Express in 2005-2006. Currently, in his second stint with The Indian Express, he reports from the Supreme Court and writes on topics related to law and the administration of justice. Legal reporting is his forte though he has extensive experience in political and community reporting too, having spent a decade as Kerala state correspondent, The Times of India and The Telegraph. He is a stickler for facts and has several impactful stories to his credit. ... Read More

Stay updated with the latest - Click here to follow us on Instagram

Advertisement
Loading Recommendations...
Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments