scorecardresearch
Follow Us:
Saturday, November 28, 2020

2013 Harda riots: SC asks MP govt to place chargesheet before court

While 54 persons had lost their houses and businesses, 12 FIRs were registered by the police naming Surendra Singh Rajput alias Tiger as the main accused in all the cases.

Written by Milind Ghatwai | Bhopal | February 27, 2017 1:58:26 am
2013 Harda riots, 2013 september Harda riots, cow slaughter, beef ban, Khirkiya tehsil, madhya pradesh government, Kheda riots, Pahatgaon villages riot, india news, latest news Holding that the investigation in the case was complete, the High Court rejected the plea after which the petitioner moved the apex court.

While hearing a petition that alleged that the 2013 riots in Khirkiya tehsil of Harda district were not properly investigated, the Supreme Court has directed the Madhya Pradesh government to place the chargesheet, along with its translated version, before it within four weeks. Riots took place in Kheda and Pahatgaon villages under Chhipabad Police Station on September 9, 2013, over an alleged case of cow slaughter. Later, a postmortem report had revealed that the animal had died because it had consumed polythene bags.

Watch What Else Is Making News

While 54 persons had lost their houses and businesses, 12 FIRs were registered by the police naming Surendra Singh Rajput alias Tiger as the main accused in all the cases.

Seeking a CBI probe in the case, activist Anurag Modi had moved the High Court with a prayer to book BJP leader and former minister Kamal Patel and his son Sudip alleging that they had instigated the riots with an eye on the assembly elections slated three months later. The petitioner had submitted what he called evidence of the duo’s alleged involvement in the riots.

Holding that the investigation in the case was complete, the High Court rejected the plea after which the petitioner moved the apex court.

Additional Advocate General P Kaurav told The Indian Express that the chargesheet had addressed all the allegations made by the petitioner. He also said that Anurag Modi did not produce evidence when he was served a notice by the local police station.

The petitioner argued that he had already submitted the evidence in his petition filed before the High Court. He added Sudeep was made an accused a month after the incident and after getting a notice from the High Court, but he was not arrested till the assembly elections were over.

📣 The Indian Express is now on Telegram. Click here to join our channel (@indianexpress) and stay updated with the latest headlines

For all the latest India News, download Indian Express App.

0 Comment(s) *
* The moderation of comments is automated and not cleared manually by indianexpress.com.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement