Follow Us:
Saturday, June 25, 2022

1984 anti-Sikh riots: Case closed years ago, two charged with murder, rioting

Special Judge Ajay Pandey said there was prima facie “sufficient material” on record to frame charges against the accused — Naresh Sehrawat and Yashpal Singh

Written by Abhishek Angad | New Delhi |
November 3, 2017 1:45:17 am
1984 anti sikh riots, anti sikh riots, anti sikh riots trial, indira gandhi assassination, anti sikh riots investigation, anti sikh riots accused,  Satram Das Meghwar said his daughter was born on July 14, 2001. His lawyer also contended that the marriage under the age of 18 was a punishable offence under the Sindh Child Marriages Restraint Act, 2013.

A Special court has framed charges against two accused and started trial in an 1984 anti-Sikh riots case. The chargesheet in the case was filed by a Special Investigation Team (SIT) — constituted in 2015 to re-investigate “serious criminal cases” filed in Delhi after the anti-Sikh riots, and had since been closed.

The case dates back to October 31, 1984, when Avtar Singh and Hardev Singh were allegedly murdered in Mahipalpur following the assassination of then PM Indira Gandhi. Court records reveal that a mob comprising 500 people, including the present accused, allegedly burnt shops and looted people in the area.

Special Judge Ajay Pandey said there was prima facie “sufficient material” on record to frame charges against the accused — Naresh Sehrawat
and Yashpal Singh — for murder and rioting.  However, after the incident, a case was registered at Mehrauli police station in 1984. Following investigation, a chargesheet was filed against one accused, who was, however, acquitted by an Additional Sessions Judge.

Later, when the Justice Ranganath Mishra Commission was constituted, a “first informant”, Santokh Singh, filed an affidavit stating that 500 people looted Mahipalpur in 1984.  Based on his affidavit, another FIR was registered in 1993, and an ACP-rank officer filed an “untrace report” in court. The Metropolitan Magistrate, however, said, “Police were at liberty to file challan as and when accused persons were arrested.” The SIT filed a chargesheet in the case in 2017.

Best of Express Premium
Need to accelerate reform pace in energy transition: CEO, Niti AayogPremium
5G: All spectrum may not get sold; govt stares at shortfallPremium
We need to formulate a structured gaming law that allows players to enjoy...Premium
UPSC Key-June 24, 2022: Know why ‘Sorrow of Assam’ to ‘Sri La...Premium

During arguments in the case, the counsel for the accused submitted that the case was thoroughly investigated in 1984 by an ACP-rank officer and that witnesses referred in the chargesheet had already been examined.  “….Thereafter, respective testimonies have been appreciated by the then Additional Sessions Judge, who found the same untrustworthy… also the ACP had recorded the statements of the witnesses cited in the present chargesheet… and they could not identify the assailants,” the defence counsel submitted in court.

Judge Ajay Pandey said even though the FIR was registered on the basis of Santokh Singh’s affidavit, later, statements of witnesses have been recorded. Those statements, he said, have categorically indicated the involvement of the accused in the case.

Express Subscription Check out our special pricing for international readers when the offer lasts

📣 Join our Telegram channel (The Indian Express) for the latest news and updates

For all the latest India News, download Indian Express App.

  • Newsguard
  • The Indian Express website has been rated GREEN for its credibility and trustworthiness by Newsguard, a global service that rates news sources for their journalistic standards.
  • Newsguard
0 Comment(s) *
* The moderation of comments is automated and not cleared manually by