This is an archive article published on December 28, 2016
Premium

UP elections 2017: Why smaller castes could hold the key to power

Yadavs, Jatavs, upper castes have shown fairly stable political loyalties in recent times, and Muslims have largely gone with the party most likely to defeat BJP. But successive elections have shown that the road to Lucknow passes through successful social coalitions

Written by: Anand Mishra
8 min readDec 29, 2016 12:16 PM IST First published on: Dec 28, 2016 at 12:45 AM IST
uttar pradesh, up elections. up election prediction, uttar pradesh news, india news, up campaign, samajwadi party , bsp, bjp, mayawati, amit shah, The UP government has been reaching out aggressively to disadvantaged sections of society through schemes and awards. (Source: Pramod Adhikari/Express file)

Small is big when it comes to deciding electoral outcomes in Uttar Pradesh where every vote counts in a highly-divided polity. So when the Akhilesh Yadav government cleared the inclusion of 17 Other Backward Castes in the Scheduled Castes (SC) list last week, the caste-ridden landscape of UP politics was abuzz again.

BSP chief Mayawati assailed the SP government over the “election stunt”, but also claimed that “it was the BSP government that had sent this recommendation to the Centre earlier”.

Advertisement

Watch: UP Elections: Mulayam Singh Yadav Ruled Out Alliance, Announces Candidates For 325 Seats

The 17 sub-castes which the government wants included in the SC category are Kahar, Kashyap, Kewat, Nishad, Bind, Bhar, Prajapati, Rajbhar, Batham, Gauriya, Turha, Majhi, Mallah, Kumhar, Dheemar, Dheewar and Machhua. By itself, each has a very small voteshare, but together, they make up a significant chunk of votes. How can they affect electoral outcomes?

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments