The resolution of the Executive Board of the Sahitya Akademi confirmed the moral pressure writers exerted on the institution as they forced the Akademi’s chairperson into holding an emergency meeting.
While the resolution was not a political statement against the central government, as the writers had demanded, the Akademi did ask the government to ensure security for writers. Coming from an institution, whose office-bearers have refrained from speaking against the government, the statement helped to defuse the immediate crisis.
However, the Akademi ignored the most crucial issue, returning of the awards by writers. All it has done is make a mere request to them to take back the awards. Since many of them have categorically said that they will not reconsider their decision, the fate of the cheques they have returned, lying with the Akademi, is still uncertain.
- ‘Do not stop writing’: Kerala CM Pinarayi Vijayan backs writer Hareesh over novel controversy
- Several writers including Nayantara Sahgal to take back Sahitya Akademi award
- Sahitya Akademi shouldn’t be needlessly politicized: Asam Sahitya Sabha
- Returning the award questions the Sahitya Akademi’s authority
- Two more writers return Sahitya Akademi awards, another resigns
- Sahitya Akademi urges writers to keep awards, tells govt it wants ‘peaceful coexistence’
The resolution also expressed its confidence in the present leadership, defying stalwarts like Nayantara Sahgal, Ashok Vajpeyi and Amitav Ghosh who blamed that the leadership for its failure to act as the custodian of creativity. Many writers believed that the present crisis had emerged because the Akademi did not take speak up when required.
With the present leadership continuing, these writers would now find it difficult to have any association with the Akademi.
Considering the fact that some of the office-bearers have strongly disapproved of the protest of the writers, even termed it “ho-halla”, the tussle between the Akademi and the writers might snowball into a recurring confrontation, a situation that would only harm the institution.
The present resolution might soothe some tempers, it brings no lasting solution.