On New Year’s Eve, Australia’s Prime Minister Scott Morrison made a surprise announcement: the government will remove a reference to the country being “young and free” in the national anthem.
The move comes weeks after Gladys Berejiklian, the leader of Australia’s most populous state, New South Wales, had urged the country to make changes to its national anthem, ‘Advance Australia Fair’, particularly the line “we are young and free”, which Berejiklian had said dismissed centuries of indigenous history.
What was the issue with the national anthem?
‘Advance Australia Fair’ was written in 1878, but it became the official national anthem only in 1984. Critics say the words in the second line that reads “for we are young and free”, obliterate more than 50,000 years of indigenous history and is an attempt at historical revisionism.
Critics say the word “young” in the national anthem had implied that Australia’s history only starts with colonisation. Australia marks January 26 as the date when the “First Fleet” sailed into Sydney Harbour in 1788, carrying mostly convicts and troops from Britain. But many indigenous people in the country refer to Australia Day as “Invasion Day”.
The change that takes effect on January 1, is the first amendment to ‘Advance Australia Fair’ since 1984. Now the lyrics will read: “Australians all let us rejoice/ For we are one and free”.
What has been the response?
While some indigenous Australians, particularly political leaders, have welcomed the change, there have been others who have criticised what is essentially a symbolic move. Following Morrison’s announcement, Luke Pearson who edits ‘IndigenousX’, an online platform explained in a blog post why the change to lyrics does little for the community.
“Changing the anthem from ‘young’ to ‘one’ is not only problematic because it’s symbolic tokenism aimed at silencing dissent that completely misses the nature of the dissent in the first place, but it’s also problematic because it’s the same wrongly labelled ‘one’ as the one made famous by ‘One Nation’,” Pearson had written.
Are other lines in the national anthem problematic?
Critics of the national anthem have said that it isn’t only one line that is problematic, but rather, most of it. In 2019, in a segment on Australian news satire series ‘The Weekly with Charlie Pickering’, indigenous rapper Briggs had broken down each line of the national anthem to show how it wasn’t just a matter of one or two phrases or sentences that needed to be changed.
“Changing the national anthem is real reconciliation. It’s something I’ve believed in for quite some time and a significant defining moment for the Morrison government” – I just can’t understand how anyone can truly believe this?! #NationalAnthem #auspol https://t.co/NumKMyfk6V
— eddie synot (@EddieSynot) January 1, 2021
In an interview with Australia’s Daily Telegraph, Briggs had criticised the inclusion of the word “wealth”. “We don’t see much of that wealth. Only one in 10 of us are financially secure,” Briggs told the news publication.
The national anthem also has a line “Our land abounds in nature’s gifts”. But Briggs had explained why the indigenous community found it problematic: “You see that just reminds us that our land was our land before our home was girt by you lot.”
The reactions to the change have been mixed across the country. Many in Australia’s political circles have welcomed the move, saying it was long overdue. “It is an acknowledgment that Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cultures date back 65,000 years,” said Ken Wyatt, Minister for Indigenous Australians.
Following the announcement, Morrison had said: “It’s a change for all Australians, and I’ve already been encouraged by the strong response from Australians right across the country, Indigenous, non-Indigenous, people of all different backgrounds, people of all different political views.
But there have also been those in Australia’s political circles who have criticised the change.
I disagree with the decision to remove the word "young" from our national anthem. We are a young nation that doesn't have the same historical hang ups of older cultures. That's why people overseas want to move here because we offer a fresh, young start. Happy new year to all
— Matthew Canavan (@mattjcan) December 31, 2020
Queensland Nationals senator and former minister Matthew Canavan objected to the change, voicing his views in a Twitter post: “I disagree with the decision to remove the word “young” from our national anthem. We are a young nation that doesn’t have the same historical hang ups of older cultures. That’s why people overseas want to move here because we offer a fresh, young start. Happy new year to all.”
📣 The Indian Express is now on Telegram. Click here to join our channel (@indianexpress) and stay updated with the latest headlines