This is an archive article published on May 29, 2015
Premium

Explained: Tripura junks the controversial AFSPA, where do the other states in Northeast stand?

Tripura imposed AFSPA in February 1997 after a spate of killings and kidnappings by the National Liberation Front of Tripura.

4 min readGuwahatiMay 29, 2015 08:27 AM IST First published on: May 29, 2015 at 03:57 AM IST
Tripura, AFSPA, Tripura AFSPA, AFSPA tripura, Tripura armed forces act, armes forces act, tripura news, india news, Nagaland AFSPA, Manipur AFSPA, AssamAFSPA, Meghalaya AFSPA, Arunanchal Pradesh AFSPA, Mizoram AFSPA, indian express Tripura imposed AFSPA in February 1997 after a spate of killings and kidnappings by the National Liberation Front of Tripura, bringing two-thirds of its then 42 police station areas under its provisions.

Tripura has withdrawn the Armed Forces (Special Powers) Act (AFSPA), but the law continues to be in force elsewhere in the Northeast, besides in J&K. Tripura imposed AFSPA in February 1997 after a spate of killings and kidnappings by the National Liberation Front of Tripura, bringing two-thirds of its then 42 police station areas under its provisions. As the Left Front government made its decision on Wednesday, AFSPA was in force in only 26 of the state’s 74 police station areas.

NAGALAND: Older than state

AFSPA was enacted in 1958, before the birth of Nagaland in December 1961. AFSPA came in the context of the Naga rebellion in what was then the Naga Hills district of Assam — and has refused to leave more than 50 years after the new state was created, thanks to continued insurgencies by multiple rebel groups. But the situation has changed dramatically since the NSCN(M) — “the mother of all insurgencies” — began peace talks over 14 years ago, and most civil society groups in Nagaland are now opposed to the continuation of AFSPA.

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments