Premium

Beyond Kashmir, Hyderabad: 4 princely states that initially refused to join India

The princely states, both pampered and exploited by the British, had maintained a position of semi-autonomy and were the toughest challenge facing free India.

The Hon'ble Sardar Patel was received by the Maharaja of Jaipur at Jaipur in December, 1947. (Wikimedia Commons)The Hon'ble Sardar Patel was received by the Maharaja of Jaipur at Jaipur in December, 1947. (Wikimedia Commons)
7 min readNew DelhiAug 16, 2026 05:57 PM IST First published on: Aug 15, 2026 at 08:00 AM IST

The midnight of August 15, 1947, is perhaps noted as the most significant in the pages of Indian history. In the words of Jawaharlal Nehru, India awoke to life and freedom.

But if freedom is the hard-earned dream come true for the nationalist leaders of India, then stitching together the hundreds of territorial pieces into a distinct whole was an aspiration much harder to realise and lay yet unfulfilled.

Advertisement

Dealing with princely states, Patel’s role

The departure of the British from Indian territory was accompanied by the question of how to bring together the 500-odd chiefdoms and states they had left behind.

The princely states, both pampered and exploited by the British, maintained a position of semi-autonomy under the colonisers and were the toughest challenge facing free India. Once the withdrawal of the British was announced, the issue of the princely states had to be settled for the new government that would be in power. By the late 1930s itself, the Congress had made clear their intention of integrating the states into the Indian Union.

Adrija Roychowdhury leads the research section at Indianexpress.com. She writes long features on his... Read More

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments