Follow Us:
Wednesday, August 17, 2022

What now at Sikkim trijunction?

Indian and Chinese troops have stood face-to-face on the Dolam plateau for nearly a month now. Neither side has seemed willing to back off. Where can things go from here? There are six possible scenarios.

Written by Sushant Singh |
Updated: July 14, 2017 11:00:04 am
sikkim standoff, india china standoff, dolam standoff, india-china-bhutan border, sikkim trijunction, indo-china border dispute, indian soldiers, chinese soldiers At a press conference on June 29, Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Lu Kang released these labelled pictures, which he said “clearly show that the Indian soldiers and vehicles have overstepped the crest which is defined as the boundary and entered Chinese territory”.

The standoff began on June 16, when Indian soldiers moved on to the Dolam plateau to prevent Chinese soldiers from constructing a road through the area. This area, adjacent to the trijunction of the borders of India, China and Bhutan, is strategically important for India. Over 300 Indian soldiers have pitched tents opposite the slightly smaller Chinese military unit, with some 100-150 metres separating the two armies. What does the future hold?

Scenario 1: India withdraws, China builds the road

This is what the Chinese have been demanding aggressively. Their argument is that Indian soldiers are in Chinese territory — the Indians contend that it is Bhutanese territory — and should withdraw from the area before any talks take place. But having spent almost four weeks in the area, and realising the threat the Chinese road will pose to the Jampheri Ridge, there is little chance that India will withdraw unilaterally. There are no problems of logistics, supply chains or turnover of soldiers for India, which can force it to back off. A unilateral withdrawal will also mean a loss of face for New Delhi.


Subscriber Only Stories
Delhi Confidential: Health Minister Mansukh Mandaviya earns praise from C...Premium
Delhi Police in RTI reply: 80% match in facial recognition is deemed posi...Premium
Ratan Tata backed start-up to empower senior citizensPremium
Explained: Why the 11 convicts in Bilkis Bano gangrape case walked out of...Premium

Scenario 2: China withdraws unilaterally, India stays

This is the Indian demand — that China must stop building the road and withdraw from the area unilaterally. But the Chinese have turned up the rhetoric, and do not appear keen to walk away now. That they are only two kilometres short of Jampheri Ridge, and already south of the Batang La pass, which India claims is the trijunction of borders, seems to have emboldened them. In any case, if the Chinese were to withdraw unilaterally, there would no reason for India to stay on in Bhutanese territory. But then, a unilateral withdrawal would mean a loss of face for China now.


Scenario 3: Neither side withdraws, stalemate continues

Both armies could choose to stay on until something gives. This means status quo — with a prolonged stalemate of the kind that happened in 1987, when the two sides were face to face for several months in the Sumdorong Chu valley in Arunachal Pradesh. But the deployment then was over a large frontage — and India now has much better infrastructure and resources to sustain a small body of troops for a long time on Dolam plateau. The Chinese could do the same — and assuming Bhutan does not change its stance, the two sides could be in for a long haul.


Scenario 4: Diplomacy works, both sides withdraw

India and China haven’t fired a shot on their border for half a decade, and most standoffs have been resolved by diplomatic means. This is how the Chumar incursion was resolved in 2014, as was the Depsang incident in 2013. However, in neither of those cases had the two sides resorted to rhetoric of the kind that is being heard now — nor did the Chinese lay down preconditions for talks as they have now. While this does make it difficult for both sides to back off now, creative diplomacy can find answers to even the most vexed of problems.


Scenario 5: Escalation by China, a limited conflict

India’s limited aim is to prevent the Chinese from building the road to the Jampheri Ridge, and it has no reason to escalate the conflict. Even status quo achieves India’s goal; for China, however, the goal could be different. But an escalation by the Chinese on the Dolam plateau itself would be suicidal, as Indian forces dominate that area. It is for this reason that the Chinese forces have not even tried to resume road construction after the Indians stopped them. However, the Chinese could, in theory, escalate in some other area, i.e., initiate a limited conflict, perhaps in Ladakh or the Northeast. But as Defence Minister Arun Jaitley said, 2017 is not 1962. The Chinese know that as well.

Less likely.

Scenario 6: A full-fledged war

One thing: nuclear weapons.


📣 Join our Telegram channel (The Indian Express) for the latest news and updates

For all the latest Explained News, download Indian Express App.

  • Newsguard
  • The Indian Express website has been rated GREEN for its credibility and trustworthiness by Newsguard, a global service that rates news sources for their journalistic standards.
  • Newsguard
First published on: 14-07-2017 at 12:49:46 am
0 Comment(s) *
* The moderation of comments is automated and not cleared manually by

Featured Stories