Explained: Delhi smoke, Punjab water — the tradeoffhttps://indianexpress.com/article/explained/delhi-smoke-punjab-water-the-tradeoff-punjab-water-table-delhi-air-pollution-6108662/

Explained: Delhi smoke, Punjab water — the tradeoff

A decade-old law has led to the sowing and transplantation of the summer paddy crop in Punjab to be delayed by about a fortnight, and moved the harvesting season to end-October and early November.

Explained — Delhi smoke, Punjab water: the tradeoff
Farmers’ organisations say late sowing and transplanting delays the harvesting as well, and they are left with a very small window to prepare their fields for the next crop.

A 10-year-old Punjab law is being blamed for contributing to the air pollution over Delhi and surrounding areas. The law led to the sowing and transplantation of the summer paddy crop to be delayed by about a fortnight, and moved the harvesting season to end-October and early November — a time when the moist air and largely inactive wind systems cause particulate matter and gases from burning paddy stubble to hang in the atmosphere. This air is carried by northwesterly winds towards Delhi, which lies to the southeast of Punjab.

What is The Punjab Preservation of Subsoil Water Act, 2009?

The law, brought by the SAD-BJP government of Chief Minister Parkash Singh Badal, aimed at conserving groundwater by mandatorily delaying the transplanting of paddy to beyond June 10, when the most severe phase of evapotranspiration (transfer of water from land to the atmosphere through evaporation from the soil and plant transpiration) is over. Farmers were forbidden from sowing paddy before May 10, and transplanting it before June 10. Haryana has a similar law.

Why was the law enacted?

There has been serious concern over the drastic fall in the water table in Punjab. Paddy is procured by the government at minimum support price (MSP), and leads to over-exploitation of underground aquifers, as a very large number of tubewells (more than 14 lakh in 2015-16) running on free power pump out virtually endless amounts of water.

The Punjab State Farmers Commission (PSFC), led by the late Dr G S Kalkat, pushed for the law — he suggested it to Capt Amarinder Singh’s Congress government in 2006, and followed up with the Badal government that took over in 2007. Despite farmers being a formidable votebank, Dr Kalkat was able to convince the government that early transplanting of rice (before mid-June) resulted in unsustainable withdrawals of groundwater with the monsoon still far, temperatures very high, and the evapotranspiration rate (ETR) at its peak.

Advertising

What is the law’s link with air pollution?

Farmers’ organisations say late sowing and transplanting delays the harvesting as well (it is end-October by the time operations end), and they are left with a very small window to prepare their fields for the next (wheat) crop. In this situation, setting the stubble ablaze is a quick-fix solution. By this time, temperatures have started to fall, and a combination of atmospheric and meteorological conditions ensure that the smoke cannot disperse easily. A part of the smoke from the farm fires is carried by westerly winds towards the NCR and further down the Indo-Gangetic plain. Last year, the date for paddy transplantation under the Act was pushed to June 20; it was advanced this year to June 13.

But does the Act really help conserve groundwater?

A study, ‘Impact of Preservation of Subsoil Water Act on Groundwater Depletion: The Case of Punjab, India’ (Environmental Management, 2016) by Amarnath Tripathi, Ashok K Mishra, and Geetanjali Verma, reported “a robust effect of the 2009 Act on reducing groundwater depletion”. Between 2008-09 and 2012-13, the average annual rate of decline of groundwater in Punjab was 0.7 metres, less than the 0.9 m during the period 2000-01 to 2008-09, the study found.

What is Punjab’s underground water situation currently?

According to a report in May 2019 by the Central Ground Water Board under the Ministry of Jal Shakti, 105 out of 138 blocks are in the dark zone. At current rates of depletion, good quality water in the first aquifer up to a depth of 100 m shall be exhausted in 10 years, and the entire subsurface water resource could be finished in the next 22 years.

Is Punjab willing to do away with the subsoil water preservation law?

No. The government argues that the main reason for the declining water table is the cultivation of paddy, which Punjab produces for the central pool. Stubble burning can be managed, especially if the Centre helps with money to compensate farmers — but dry aquifers cannot be recharged, it says.

Also read | Explained: What next in Maharashtra?