Premium

Sai Pallavi miscast in Ek Din? Even Aamir Khan hasn’t gotten his own roles right

As Sai Pallavi recently remarked that she may have been miscast in Ek Din, it is worth noting that Aamir Khan himself has been miscast in his own recent ventures.

Aamir KhanAamir Khan’s most recent performances reveal a disconcerting inability to calibrate emotional nuance.

Wide-eyed, mouth agape, brows arching in conflicting directions, and a voice calibrated to a cartoonish pitch. These alone capture Aamir Khan’s last two performances. The characters could scarcely be more disparate, the settings poles apart, the films themselves worlds away. Yet Aamir’s tonal signature remains parochial. Whether embodying human disability in Laal Singh Chaddha or affirming that difference is no deficiency in Sitaare Zameen Par, his delivery borders on buffoonery, undermining the very humanity he intends to convey.

Why this sudden critique of his performances? Why not. Recently, Sai Pallavi, in her Bollywood debut with the Aamir-backed Ek Din, confessed on his YouTube channel that perhaps she had been miscast, saying, “I think somebody else was meant to do this film.” It makes you wonder, the superstar, hailed as the “thinking Khan,” seems increasingly at odds with his own portrayals. The precision he demands from others often eludes him in his own embodiment.

Casting gone wrong in Laal Singh Chaddha

The casting story of Laal Singh Chaddha is arguably more revealing than the film itself. On multiple occasions, Aamir Khan has revealed that it was not he, but his son Junaid Khan, whom he had envisioned to helm the role. In a conversation with Jio Hotstar, Aamir explained that when Junaid returned to India after completing his acting training in Los Angeles, he was curious to see how his son had evolved as an actor. So he decided to test him as an actor.

Recounting the early stages, Aamir said, “I loved the script of Forrest Gump. We were very excited. At that time, Junaid had just completed his acting course in LA. He had returned with experience, and I thought, let me see what he has learned.” He asked director Advait Chandan to shoot select scenes with Junaid, not simply to assess him, but also to gauge Chandan’s ability to manage a project of that scale.

“He shot about twenty minutes of film, two or three difficult scenes we selected. When I saw it for the first time, I was shocked, Junaid was so good.” Aamir then screened the footage for family and industry insiders. “I showed it to my family, to Mansoor. He said, ‘Aamir, you should take Junaid, you should not do this film. He is Laal.’ I showed it to others in the industry to be sure, and almost everyone agreed: he was perfect for the role.”

By then, Aamir Khan was convinced. “At that point, I was certain we should take Junaid as Laal Singh Chaddha because he was doing exceptionally well.” Yet, for multiple reasons, Aamir ultimately chose to play the role himself. He admitted, however, that Junaid’s performance influenced his own: “The honest truth is, when I finally did the film, I kept referring to Junaid, how he would have done it, and I think that unsettled my performance. If I hadn’t seen him, it wouldn’t have mattered.”

Also Read | Dhurandhar 2: Aditya Dhar genuflects and the story sinks into subservience

Story continues below this ad
Aamir Khan Aamir Khan in a still from Sitaare Zameen Par.

Same story with Sitaare Zameen Par

What is perhaps most intriguing is Aamir Khan’s own admission after Laal Singh Chaddha’s failure. He confessed that his performance had gone astray and promised to avoid the same mistake in his next, Sitaare Zameen Par. On Rhea Chakraborty’s podcast, he had said, “My performance in Laal Singh Chaddha was pitched too high. Unlike the original, where Tom Hanks carried the film effortlessly, my performance let it down. By my reading, it was not good. I hope to do better next time.”

In the same chat, he went onto praise Sitaare Zameen Par, calling it “a great film.” But the underlying flaw remained: the familiar tropes, gaping eyes, buffoonish body language, an overly elevated pitch, persisted. Across the board, viewers sensed the same dissonance: the film could have offered effortless entertainment, but Aamir’s casting once again undermined it, leaving the story heavier, less natural, and oddly distorted by its own intended charm.

If we look further back, a pattern in Aamir Khan’s performances emerges. Even in films like Thugs of Hindostan, Secret Superstar, PK, (one of his dual roles in) Dhoom 3, or even Ghajini, he consistently seems to favour exaggeration over genuine earnestness. There’s a method to his madness which is simply an intentional tilt towards caricature. You can almost see the effort, the craft being consciously deployed, rather than the character living organically.

The most revealing moment came last year, when an audition tape surfaced showing Aamir giving a shot at the character of Ravi Kishan in his ex-wife, Kiran Rao’s Laapataa Ladies. Watching the clip, everything that has gone wrong in his portrayals becomes clear. His interpretation of a foul-mouthed, chest-thumping cop was almost painful to witness, a study in overemphasis that bordered on the absurd. Yet, the smart part of the story is that both Kiran and Aamir himself recognized the superficiality. He should not be cast.

Story continues below this ad

Some self awareness. Some honesty with oneself. Some courage to step back.

Anas Arif is a prolific Entertainment Journalist and Cinematic Analyst at The Indian Express, where he specializes in the intersection of Indian pop culture, auteur-driven cinema, and industrial ethics. His writing is defined by a deep-seated commitment to documenting the evolving landscape of Indian entertainment through the lens of critical theory and narrative authorship. Experience & Career As a core member of The Indian Express entertainment vertical, Anas has cultivated a unique beat that prioritizes the "craft behind the celebrity." He has interviewed a vast spectrum of industry veterans, from blockbuster directors like Vijay Krishna Acharya, Sujoy Ghosh, Maneesh Sharma to experimental filmmakers and screenwriters like Anurag Kashyap, Vikramaditya Motwane, Varun Grover, Rajat Kapoor amongst several others. His career is characterized by a "Journalism of Courage" approach, where he frequently tackles the ethical implications of mainstream cinema and the socio-political subtext within popular media. He is also the host of the YouTube series Cult Comebacks, where he talks to filmmakers about movies that may not have succeeded initially but have, over time, gained a cult following. The show aims to explore films as works of art, rather than merely commercial ventures designed to earn box office revenue. Expertise & Focus Areas Anas's expertise lies in his ability to deconstruct cinematic works beyond surface-level reviews. His focus areas include: Auteur Studies: Detailed retrospectives and analyses of filmmakers such as Imtiaz Ali, Anurag Kashyap, and Neeraj Ghaywan, often exploring their central philosophies and creative evolutions. Cinematic Deconstruction: Examining technical and narrative choices, such as the use of aspect ratios in independent films (Sabar Bonda) or the structural rhythm of iconic soundtracks (Dilwale Dulhania Le Jayenge). Industrial & Social Ethics: Fearless critique of commercial blockbusters, particularly regarding the promotion of bigoted visions or the marginalization of communities in mainstream scripts. Exclusive Long-form Interviews: Conducting high-level dialogues with actors and creators to uncover archival anecdotes and future-looking industry insights. Authoritativeness & Trust Anas Arif has established himself as a trusted voice by consistently moving away from standard PR-driven journalism. Whether he is interrogating the "mythology of Shah Rukh Khan" in modern sequels or providing a space for independent filmmakers to discuss the "arithmetic of karma," his work is rooted in objectivity and extensive research. Readers look to Anas for an educated viewpoint that treats entertainment not just as a commodity, but as a critical reflection of the country's collective conscience. ... Read More

Click here to follow Screen Digital on YouTube and stay updated with the latest from the world of cinema.

Advertisement
Loading Recommendations...
Advertisement
Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments