Karan Johar, Aditya Chopra, Dinesh Vijan spent over Rs 180 cr on legal costs in five years; here’s what it means

Unlike predictable line items such as salaries or equipment rentals, legal fees remain inherently uncertain, varying significantly depending on the nature and intensity of the issue at hand.

Aditya ChopraAditya Chopra-Karan Johar pay Rs 182 crore legal cost. (Photo: Karan Johar/Instagram/IMDb)

While last year’s conversations around Hindi cinema largely revolved around soaring budgets, ballooning star fees, and ever-expanding entourages, this year has brought a different cost centre into focus—legal fees. And the numbers are striking. According to a report by Bollywood Hungama, three major production houses—Dharma Productions (Karan Johar), Yash Raj Films (Aditya Chopra), and Maddock Films (Dinesh Vijan)—have collectively spent Rs 182.05 crore on legal and professional charges over the last five years.

Legal cost of big production houses:

Production house FY20-21 FY21-22 FY22-23 FY23-24 FY24-25 Total
Yash Raj Films Rs 13.72 crore Rs 15.53 crore Rs 24.45 crore Rs 40.63 crore Rs 40.40 crore Rs 134.73 crore
Dharma Productions Rs 5.40 crore Rs 2.57 crore Rs 2.80 crore Rs 2.95 cr Rs 17.19 crore Rs 30.91 crore
Maddock Films Rs 2.20 crore Rs 3.30 crore Rs 3.98 crore Rs 3.69 crore Rs 3.24 crore Rs 16.41
Grand Total Rs 21.32 crore Rs 21.4 crore Rs 31.23 crore Rs 47.27 crore Rs 60.83 Rs 182.05

The escalation has been sharp. What stood at Rs 21.32 crore in FY 2020–21 more than tripled by FY 2024–25, reaching Rs 60.83 crore. Notably, Yash Raj Films alone accounted for nearly two-thirds of that year’s total spend.

So what exactly are these legal professional charges for?

Unlike production costs or star fees—which can be controlled to an extent through planning and negotiation—legal expenses have become unavoidable in today’s entertainment ecosystem. These charges broadly cover three areas: permissions, protection, and payments.

Permission

The legal process begins well before a film goes on floors. Every project requires airtight rights clearance—whether it involves an original script, a book adaptation, life rights, remake rights, or any underlying intellectual property. This stage is critical. Any oversight can lead to claims that surface later, sometimes threatening to stall or even block a film’s release—a risk that has repeatedly made headlines, particularly in the case of biopics.

ALSO READ | She came to make films, now leads one of India’s biggest production houses; is reason behind Mirzapur, Pataal Lok, and Panchayat

Once rights are secured, legal work expands into the contracts that keep a production running. Talent agreements for actors, directors, and writers; deal memos; crew contracts; vendor agreements for studios, equipment, VFX, and post-production; location permissions; and releases—all fall under routine but extensive legal support.

Monetisation and exploitation

A third layer involves monetisation and exploitation. Theatrical distribution terms, domestic and overseas arrangements, satellite licensing, OTT deals, music rights, dubbing and subtitling contracts, brand integrations, and merchandising agreements must all be negotiated and structured to prevent future disputes.

Story continues below this ad

In today’s market, a single film typically has multiple revenue windows, each with its own contractual framework. Managing these parallel negotiations alone can keep legal teams engaged for months, particularly when multiple partners and territories are involved.

Protection

The final—and often most volatile—phase is release and reputation protection. Certification and regulatory compliance require careful handling, but major titles also face last-minute risks: objections, legal notices, claims, and threats of injunctions that emerge close to release.

This is where legal costs can spike dramatically. Disputes involving copyright infringement or plagiarism, title conflicts, defamation claims, privacy concerns, arbitration over termination, payments, credits, or revenue shares, along with anti-piracy actions, demand urgent, high-stakes legal intervention—often involving external counsel and extended litigation.

The year-on-year increase in legal expenditure suggests that production houses are increasingly navigating complex and escalated disputes. Unlike predictable line items such as salaries or equipment rentals, legal fees remain inherently uncertain, varying significantly depending on the nature and intensity of the issue at hand.

Story continues below this ad

And this data reflects just three major banners. One can only imagine the annual legal outlay for production houses such as Aamir Khan Productions, Red Chillies Entertainment, Hombale Films, or Ajay Devgn Films—each juggling multiple projects, platforms, and jurisdictions simultaneously. Not to forget, the streaming platforms.

Click here to follow Screen Digital on YouTube and stay updated with the latest from the world of cinema.

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments
Advertisement
Loading Taboola...
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement