scorecardresearch
Follow Us:
Thursday, July 29, 2021

SC refuses to stay Delhi HC order allowing pvt schools to levy development, annual fees

The top court, however, said although it was dismissing the appeal of the Delhi government, this would not come in the adjudication of its plea by a division bench of the high court as nothing on merits have been recorded by it.

By: PTI | New Delhi I |
Updated: June 28, 2021 7:56:08 pm
sc on school fees, sc on fee hike, delhi schoolsSchools were asked to waive only annual charges and development fees. File

The Supreme Court on Monday refused to stay the Delhi High Court order allowing private unaided schools to collect annual and development charges from students for the period after the lockdown ended in the national capital last year.

 A bench comprising Justices A M Khanwilkar, Dinesh Maheshwari and Aniruddha Bose did not agree with the submission of the Directorate of Education (DoE) of Delhi government that it has the power to regulate the levy of fees by private unaided schools and the high court judgement permitting such a levy of annual and development charges be stayed.

Read | Delhi govt issues circular for teaching-learning activities in its schools till they reopen

“We are not inclined to grant you the stay,” the bench told senior advocate Vikas Singh, appearing for Delhi government, vehemently seeking the stay of the judgment saying, lakhs and lakhs of parents will be affected. Please don’t shut us out.

The top court, however, said although it was dismissing the appeal of the Delhi government, this would not come in the adjudication of its plea by a division bench of the high court as nothing on merits have been recorded by it.

“Considering the fact that the division bench is hearing the matter on July 12. All the contentions remain open and can be raised before the division bench and the dismissal of the petition does not reflect upon merits of the case,” the bench said.

On May 31, a single judge bench of the high court had quashed the office orders of April and August 2020 issued by DoE of the Delhi government forbidding and postponing collection of annual charges and development fees.

The Delhi government then filed the intra-court appeal before a division bench of the high court which on June 7 issued notices the plea but had refused to stay its single-judge order allowing private unaided schools to collect annual and development charges from students.

Aggrieved by the refusal of stay, the DoE moved the top court saying that grave injustice would be done if the stay was not granted as the government had already allowed such institutions to keep collecting 100 per cent of tuition fees. At the outset, senior advocates Shyam Divan and N K Kaul, appearing for bodies representing private schools, opposed the Delhi government’s appeal.

They said the single judge bench of the high court, on May 31, had taken note of an apex court’s judgement in the ‘Indian School, Jodhpur vs State of Rajasthan, in which it was held that the schools shall collect annual fees with a deduction of 15 per cent and had applied that in the instant case.

Read | Delhi govt to provide tabs to over 2,000 newly appointed teachers

Singh said the apex court’s judgement was not applicable in Delhi’s context as it has been held in past that DoE is duly empowered to decide the issue of levy of fees and moreover, the private schools have been already been allowed to charge tuition fees.

Referring to a report of the Duggal panel, the senior counsel for the Delhi government said the schools have to meet all their expenses from funds collected under the head of tuition fees which have been allowed to be levied fully by the administration.

📣 The Indian Express is now on Telegram. Click here to join our channel (@indianexpress) and stay updated with the latest headlines

For all the latest Education News, download Indian Express App.

  • The Indian Express website has been rated GREEN for its credibility and trustworthiness by Newsguard, a global service that rates news sources for their journalistic standards.
Advertisement

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement