Premium

From village clinic to Supreme Court: A 78-year-old Kerala doctor’s decade-long fight for better brain death protocol

Acting on his petition, top court directs AIIMS to set up expert panel to review if there are better ways to determine if a person is brain dead than the currently used apnea test

Supreme Court, Chief Election CommissionerThe petitions have challenged the Chief Election Commissioner and other Election Commissioners (Appointment, Conditions of Service, and Term of Office) Act, 2023. File Photo

From his modest five-room clinic in the coastal village of Sakthikulangara in Kerala’s Kollam district, a 78-year-old doctor has been waging a years-long battle against alleged malpractices in declaring patients brain dead, leading to the Supreme Court on Saturday directing the All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS) to set up a panel of experts to review brain death declaration protocol.

Acting upon a petition moved by Dr Sadanandan Ganapathy, the Supreme Court directed AIIMS to set up a panel of three neurology or neurosurgery experts to examine whether methods like cerebral angiogram and electroencephalogram (EEG) are better modes to determine if a person is brain dead than the currently used apnea test.

Dr Ganapathy moved the apex court after the Kerala High Court in 2017 closed his PIL, in which he had flagged a lack of transparency and alleged malpractices in declaring patients brain dead before their organs are used for transplantation.

Running SG Clinic at Sakthikulangara for the last 52 years, Ganapathy’s legal battle against the corporate healthcare world’s practices with regard to organ transplantation began a decade ago.

“My battle is half won. The present apnea test is not reliable. There is no evidence whether the test is even conducted or not. Doctors can write anything, can declare a person brain dead even without examining the patient. Videographing of the procedure is done only in government medical colleges. If tests like EEG and cerebral angiography are done before certifying brain death, there would be clear recorded evidence for such tests,” he said.

Ganapathy said that when he petitioned the High Court, Kerala’s health department initially agreed to his suggestion to make EEG and angiography, which he said were accepted across the world, mandatory. “But the government did not implement it under duress from big private hospitals,” he alleged.

Daughter’s word of caution

Recalling how he began the litigation to bring transparency into organ transplantation, Dr Ganapathy said, “I have been an admirer of organ donation as a noble gesture that transforms personal loss into a chance for others to live. In 2015, before I went in for heart surgery, I gave in writing to my doctor that if something were to happen to me before or after the surgery, my organs could be used for transplants for the poor. Opposing it, my daughter said if I gave consent in that manner, they (the hospital) would certify me brain dead and harvest my organs. I was shocked, but I still sent the mail.”

Story continues below this ad

After that, he said, he began exploring the issue in Kerala, where he found that there were nine cases where brain death was declared in 2012, but the number rose sharply in later years.

“The figure rose to 79 in 2015. This nine-fold increase in three years made me suspicious,” he said, claiming that he learned from colleagues in corporate-run hospitals that “if a poor young person is admitted to the hospital with brain injury”, in many cases doctors would allegedly not attempt to save them, but would focus on convincing their relatives to agree to organ donation.

He also alleged that some doctors were paid to certify brain death in several cases. “After I moved the Kerala High Court, two neurologists in Ernakulam, involved in the process of declaring brain death, told me that they were forced to do so. They claimed that they only gave their signature or seal. If they do not sign, somebody else would have done so, and they would lose their jobs, I was told,” Ganapathy said.

He also questioned the survival rates in transplant patients in the state and claimed that the government was not revealing data on this.

Story continues below this ad

Ganapathy said he has faced threats from various quarters during his legal battle. “Now, the hospitals in Kerala are worried and cautious. Had I not approached the court, the number of brain death cases in the state would have reached 400 by now,” he claimed.

His wife, Dr Jaya, had worked with the Railways, and their son, Gautham, is an IT professional in the UK. Their daughter, Geethanjali, runs a social enterprise in Bengaluru that seeks to help those who are neurodivergent.

Shaju Philip is a Senior Assistant Editor at The Indian Express, where he leads the publication's coverage from Kerala. With over 25 years of experience in mainstream journalism, he is one of the most authoritative voices on the socio-political, religious, and developmental landscape of South India. Expertise, Experience, and Authority Decades of Regional Specialization: Shaju has spent more than two decades documenting the "Kerala Model" of development, its complex communal dynamics, and its high-stakes political environment. Key Coverage Beats: His extensive reporting portfolio includes: Political & Governance Analysis: In-depth tracking of the LDF and UDF coalitions, the growth of the BJP in the state, and the intricate workings of the Kerala administration. Crime & Investigative Journalism: Noted for his coverage of high-profile cases such as the gold smuggling probe, political killings, and the state’s counter-terrorism efforts regarding radicalization modules. Crisis Management: He has led ground-level reporting during major regional crises, including the devastating 2018 floods, the Nipah virus outbreaks, and the Covid-19 pandemic response. ... Read More

Stay updated with the latest - Click here to follow us on Instagram

Advertisement
Loading Recommendations...
Advertisement
Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments