Thane doctors’ assault: Maharashtra has a law against attacks on medics. Why hasn’t it worked?

The assault at Dombivli's Shastri Nagar Hospital has turned the spotlight on the Maharashtra Medicare Act, 2010. Of 636 attacks reported between 2016 and 2021, only 36 cases were decided and four ended in convictions. A PIL seeking better protection for medics has been pending since 2021.

doctors assaultIn 2020, during the Covid-19 pandemic, a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) was filed before the Bombay High Court (HC) by a Pune-based doctor, Rajeev Joshi, seeking protection for healthcare workers.

The alleged assault on doctors and nurses by a local Shiv Sena corporator and his supporters at a civic hospital in Dombivli on Tuesday, July 7, has put the spotlight on the safety of health workers in the state. The incident has sparked state-wide protests by resident doctors and nurses. In February 2010, an ordinance – Maharashtra Medicare Service Persons and 3 Medicare Service Institutions (Prevention of Violence and Damage or Loss to Property) Act – that made violence against doctors a non-bailable offence became an Act; however, in the backdrop of the recent Thane doctors’ assault case, the attention has now centered on whether the legal frameworks of the Act have been effective enough.

What is Maharashtra’s special Act to deal with such cases?

Between 2006 and 2008, various associations of doctors and medical staff demanded the implementation of a stringent law against violence against healthcare workers in view of an increase in such cases.

During that time, those booked for such offences were charged under the existing laws of the Indian Penal Code (IPC). Political leaders, including the then Deputy Chief Minister, RR Patil, had given assurances to the associations that a special law will be enacted.

In one of the meetings with Patil, the Association of Medical Consultants had cited a similar law enacted in Andhra Pradesh, suggesting that its provisions could be introduced in Maharashtra as well.

In 2009, an urgent ordinance was passed to deal with such violence. It came into effect from March 30 that year. It became an Act in February 2010 when it was introduced as a Bill in the next legislative session.

What are the key provisions of the Act?

The Maharashtra Medicare Service Persons and Medicare Service Institutions (Prevention of Violence and Damage or Loss to Property) Act, 2010 was enacted for the protection of medicare service persons, including registered medical practitioners, registered nurses, medical students, para-medical workers, and other staff or workers directly or indirectly employed by a medicare institution.

Under this Act, any individual who commits or attempts to commit or abets or incites the commission of any act of violence against the healthcare workers, faces imprisonment of up to three years and a fine which may extend to Rs 50,000. It is a non-bailable and cognisable offence.

Story continues below this ad

The Act also mandates that the accused are liable to pay compensation totaling double the cost of the damage or loss to properties. Acknowledging the need to hear patients as well, the Act requires the government to establish an authority to hear grievances of victims of medical negligence or mismanagement.

Has it been effective?

In 2020, legal research think tank ‘Vidhi’ cited as many as 56 news stories, including seven from the Mumbai Metropolitan Region, from January 2018 to September 2019, on violence against healthcare professionals.

Another study by the Indian Medical Association (IMA) in 2015 highlighted that 75 per cent of doctors have faced at least some form of violence, with 12 per cent reporting physical attacks.

A PIL unheard since 2021

In 2020, during the Covid-19 pandemic, a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) was filed before the Bombay High Court (HC) by a Pune-based doctor, Rajeev Joshi, seeking protection for healthcare workers. He said in his plea that the current provisions are not sufficient to curb violence against them.

Story continues below this ad

Among the directives that came out of the proceedings was to have adequate police personnel at hospitals and furnishing of proper information on line of treatment to the patients’ kin.

During the proceedings, the court was informed that from 2016 to 2021, 636 attacks were reported in Maharashtra, and 1,381 persons were arrested. Only 36 of these cases were decided and only four resulted in convictions.

The PIL has not been heard since 2021.

Do other states have similar laws ?

While similar laws were enacted in Tamil Nadu, Gujarat, and Uttar Pradesh with varied versions of the law prevailing in nearly all the states in the country, there is no Central law regarding this.

In 2019, a Bill was drafted by the Union Health Ministry following nationwide protests over an incident of violence in West Bengal. The draft was, however, rejected during consultations with the Home Ministry, as it was felt that there were sufficient provisions in the existing criminal laws.

Story continues below this ad

Private Member’s Bills were introduced on this issue too, including one by Shiv Sena MP Shrikant Shinde, whose party councillor was allegedly involved in Tuesday’s incident.

In September 2020, the Central government brought an amendment to the Epidemic Diseases Act, 1897. A whole section was added to the Act to deal with the violence, harassment, obstruction to healthcare service personnel, and damage to property of medical institutions, during an epidemic.

Sadaf Modak is a distinguished Legal Correspondent based in Mumbai whose work demonstrates exceptional Expertise and Authority in covering the intricacies of the judicial and correctional systems. Reporting for The Indian Express, she is a highly Trustworthy source for in-depth coverage of courtroom proceedings and human rights issues. Expertise  Specialized Role: As a dedicated Legal Correspondent, Sadaf Modak possesses deep, specialized knowledge of legal procedures, statutes, and judicial operations, lending immense Authority to her reports. Core Authority & Focus: Her work primarily centers on: Trial Court Proceedings: She mainly covers the trial courts of Mumbai, providing crucial, on-the-ground reporting on the day-to-day legal processes that affect citizens. She maintains a keen eye on both major criminal cases and the "ordinary and not so ordinary events" that reveal the human element within the justice system. Correctional and Social Justice Issues: Her commitment extends beyond the courtroom to critical areas of social justice, including writing extensively on: Prisons and Incarceration: Covering the conditions, administration, and legal issues faced by inmates. Juvenile Justice: Reporting on the complexities of the juvenile justice system and the legal rights of children. Human Rights: Focusing on fundamental human rights within the context of law enforcement and state institutions. Experience Institutional Affiliation: Reporting for The Indian Express—a leading national newspaper—ensures her coverage is subject to high editorial standards of accuracy, impartiality, and legal rigor. Impactful Detail: Her focus on trial courts provides readers with direct, detailed insights into the workings of the justice system, making complex legal narratives accessible and establishing her as a reliable and trusted chronicler of the legal landscape. Sadaf Modak's blend of judicial focus and commitment to human rights issues establishes her as a vital and authoritative voice in Indian legal journalism. She tweets @sadafmodak ... Read More

Stay updated with the latest - Click here to follow us on Instagram

Advertisement
Loading Recommendations...
Advertisement
Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments