This is an archive article published on July 22, 2022

Police’s duty to register FIR if cognizable offence brought to its notice, says Bombay High Court

The HC said this while hearing a petition challenging a circular issued by former Mumbai Police commissioner Sanjay Pandey on June 6 that said that approval of the DCP was needed before registering FIRs under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act and in cases of molestation.

Bombay High Court, POCSO Act, POCSO cases, Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, Mumbai Police, Mumbai news, Mumbai city news, Mumbai, Maharashtra, Maharashtra government, India news, Indian Express News Service, Express News Service, Express News, Indian Express India NewsOn Wednesday, after advocate G S Hegde, representing CIDCO, sought to file an affidavit, the court declined to accept the same in hard copy.
3 min readMumbaiJul 22, 2022 12:39 AM IST First published on: Jul 22, 2022 at 12:39 AM IST

The Bombay High Court on Thursday said that it was the duty of the police to register an FIR when a cognizable offence is brought to its notice and an appropriate report can be filed later if no evidence is found in the case.

The HC said this while hearing a petition challenging a circular issued by former Mumbai Police commissioner Sanjay Pandey on June 6 that said that approval of the DCP was needed before registering FIRs under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act and in cases of molestation.

Advertisement

The June 6 order was withdrawn and a revised circular was issued on June 17, which directed police officers to immediately register FIRs in cases of molestation or crimes under POCSO in case they do not suspect any foul play. The HC was informed that the revised circular was also withdrawn on July 12 by new police commissioner Vivek Phansalkar.

A division bench of Justice Revati Mohite-Dere and Justice Sharmila Deshmukh was hearing a plea filed by the mother of a victim, who alleged that she had approached a police station in Mumbai last September after she and her minor daughter were sexually assaulted by a constable and another person.

However, she claimed the police declined to register an FIR and instead recommended that a preliminary probe be conducted to check veracity of the allegations. The petitioner then moved a special POCSO Act court, which is yet to hear the plea.

Advertisement

On Thursday, the petitioner’s advocate Arjun Kadam told HC that while the June 6 circular has been withdrawn, the special court judge was deferring the decision citing the circular.

The HC clarified that it would not direct the subordinate court to pass any order, but urged the police officers to do their duty. “Right or wrong, once it is brought to notice that a cognizable offence is committed, it is the duty of the police officer to register an FIR. Thereafter, if there is no evidence then an appropriate report can be filed.”

The High Court then directed the special judge to decide the plea before it in an expeditious manner.

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments