Follow Us:
Sunday, August 07, 2022

Maharashtra: Cong,NCP lock horns over private power project

As per MERC orders,the first 520 MW is to be supplied at original rate.

Written by Express News Service | Mumbai |
December 5, 2013 11:27:56 am

Fault lines in the ruling Democratic Front (DF) government over a private power project in Maharashtra’s Gondia district came to the fore on Wednesday.

Congress and Nationalist Congress Party (NCP) ministers crossed swords over a proposal for increase in power tariff for Tiroda-based Adani’s power plant in the Cabinet meeting. While Congress ministers opposed the hike,the NCP ministers supported it.

NCP’s Hasan Mushrif quelled the Congress-NCP divide over the issue alleging there was an attempt to show the NCP had some vested interests in the matter.

The tiff ended with Chief Minister Prithviraj Chavan announcing appointment of a six-member panel comprising government officials and private experts to decide on the tariff hike proposal.

Subscriber Only Stories
How the Indian action spectacular RRR became a smash in AmericaPremium
5 ways in which Samsung could improve the Galaxy Z Flip 4 and Fold 4Premium
‘Want to show India can bring out smaller, cost-effective SLV’: S Somanat...Premium
Delhi Rewind: How Dilshad Garden started out as a slice of LahorePremium

On August 21,2013,the Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission (MERC) allowed 57 paise extra per unit for 800 MW power to be supplied from units 2 and 3 of the power plant,whose total generation capacity is 1,320 MW and the power purchase agreement (PPA) was entered into between MahaVitran and Adani in 2008 at Rs 2.64 per unit.

As per MERC orders,the first 520 MW is to be supplied at original rate. But an interim tariff — applicable for a year or till the panel fixes new compensatory tariff (CT) — of Rs 3.12 be allowed for the remaining 800 MW.

Adani Power first sought rate revision and demanded execution of a new PPA after the Union environment ministry rejected its proposed coal linkage in Wardha. It also appealed to the government to consider a revised fuel cost for generation and supply of power arguing that it would have to incur higher expenditure on coal imports. The state’s advocate general (AG),however,opined that procurement of coal under competitive bidding process was their sole responsibility and pleading non-availability was not a valid reason for invoking such a clause.

The AG had also opposed the rate revision.

Even as the final order is pending,the state administration brought the matter before the state Cabinet. Initiating discussion,Congress minister Patangrao Kadam cited AG’s opinion. “It is not right to allow hike in rates after entering into a PPA,” he said.

Congress minister Narayan Rane added that “such a deed will set a wrong precedent”. Nitin Raut,Radhakrishna Vikhe Patil,Suresh Shetty and Naseem Khan (all Congress) backed his view.

Jayant Patil was the first to take guard for the NCP. Citing the coal block rejection,he justified the rate hike demand and also alleged that non-acceptance could lead to termination of PPA quelling load-shedding trouble.

After other NCP ministers — Anil Deshmukh,Rajesh Tope,Ganesh Naik,RR Patil and Sunil Tatkare — supported him,Mushrif raised the defamation of NCP’s suspicion.

Rane,however,countered him saying: “ Nobody is suspecting anybody. But am I not allowed to express my views in the Cabinet.”

Though Chavan indicated his fear over the rate hike proposal too,he approved the appointment of the committee. However,the name of Adani’s managing director Rajesh Adani was withdrawn from the panel after Congress ministers Satej Patil and Shetty vehemently opposed it.

TWO IS ALWAYS BETTER | Our two-year subscription package offers you more at less

📣 Join our Telegram channel (The Indian Express) for the latest news and updates

For all the latest Mumbai News, download Indian Express App.

  • Newsguard
  • The Indian Express website has been rated GREEN for its credibility and trustworthiness by Newsguard, a global service that rates news sources for their journalistic standards.
  • Newsguard
First published on: 05-12-2013 at 11:27:56 am

Featured Stories