Stay updated with the latest - Click here to follow us on Instagram
Kangana Ranaut had alleged Javed Akhtar's involvement in Sushant Singh Rajput's death. On Monday, Akhtar was cross-examined by Ranaut’s lawyer after his deposition last month before the court. (source: file)
Poet-lyricist Javed Akhtar while deposing before a magistrate court on Monday in the defamation case he filed against Kangana Ranaut said the actor’s comments against him, part of an interview in 2020, were “nothing but a lie”.
Akhtar was being cross-examined by Ranaut’s lawyer after his deposition last month before the court, where he had said the interview given to a TV channel on July 19, 2020, defamed him.
On Monday, when Rizwan Siddiquee, Ranaut’s lawyer asked a question about the interview, Akhtar said, “What she said in the interview is a lie and nothing but a lie.”
The interview being referred to was given by Ranaut to a channel over a month after the death of actor Sushant Singh Rajput by suicide on June 14, 2020, at his Bandra residence.
In his complaint, Akhtar said he was shocked to see the interview on July 19, 2020, where Ranaut had alleged his involvement in Rajput’s death and had referred to him and others as the ‘suicide gang’ of Bollywood. In his complaint, Akhtar said Ranaut had given her opinion on the circumstances around the death of Rajput “without appearing to have any direct personal knowledge of the circumstances around his death”.
Most of the questions asked to Akhtar during the cross-examination related to a ‘personal dispute’ she had with one of her former co-stars.
In a counter-complaint filed by Ranaut in 2021, she alleged that Akhtar had called her and her sister to his house during the dispute and “criminally intimidated and threatened her”. Akhtar denied this and said Ranaut had been called to his home by another person known to both of them and that she was aware of the agenda of the meeting. He also denied that she had left the meeting as she was upset and said that they had parted on a cordial note.
He said that he realised that she was unwilling to listen to him, and he changed the topic and spoke about her films and work, stating that he had always liked her work. He also denied that he had not given a disclosure to the court about the sequence of events in the meeting.
The cross-examination concluded on Monday.
Stay updated with the latest - Click here to follow us on Instagram