Premium
This is an archive article published on July 19, 2023

HC seeks railway’s response on proposal to convert 1 luggage compartment in Mumbai local trains for senior citizens

The Bombay High Court was hearing a PIL which claimed that at least 50,000 senior citizens travel daily on the suburban trains in Mumbai and during the peak hours, even youngsters find it difficult to enter the compartments

bombay-high-court-1The court subsequently sought the railway's response on consideration of the proposal by the next hearing on August 23. (File)
Listen to this article
HC seeks railway’s response on proposal to convert 1 luggage compartment in Mumbai local trains for senior citizens
x
00:00
1x 1.5x 1.8x

The Bombay High Court Wednesday was informed by the Ministry of Railways (Railway Board) that it has received a proposal from the Central and Western Railway to convert one of the luggage compartments in the local trains into a specialised senior citizen compartment and the cost and feasibility of the same have to be considered.

The court subsequently sought the railway’s response on consideration of the proposal by the next hearing on August 23.

A division bench of Acting Chief Justice Nitin M Jamdar and Justice Arif S Doctor was hearing a PIL by K P Purushothaman Nair (66), a lawyer and a retired senior private secretary of a judge, seeking directions to the Union Ministry of Railways to earmark a separate coach for senior citizens similar to the one for physically-handicapped persons in suburban local trains in Mumbai.

The PIL claimed that at least 50,000 senior citizens like Nair travel daily on suburban trains and during the peak hours, even younger people find it difficult to enter the compartments.

On Wednesday, advocate D P Singh, representing the Railway Board, said that the Board received suggestions from both the Central and Western Railway authorities who proposed to the board that one luggage compartment could be converted into a senior citizen compartment and the issue of cost and feasibility of the same is yet to be examined.

The court was told that as per internal communication within the railway department, there are four to five luggage compartments in the 12 or 15-car local trains.

Singh also said that as per proposal developed by Central Railway, there are six seats in the luggage compartment, which can be initially made available for senior citizens and additional seats can be made available by modification of the compartments if it is to be specially assigned for senior citizens.

Story continues below this ad

The court was informed that the Central and Western Railway had thought of the said proposal as the survey to ascertain actual utilisation of the compartment showed that over 80 per cent of the passengers in the luggage compartment were unauthorised and are from the general category travellers and only 10 per cent ferry goods.

Therefore, setting aside one of the three to four luggage compartments for senior citizens will not be an issue for those holding vendor tickets. It was also found that the luggage compartments take away 6.18 per cent of the area in a 12-car train but carry only 0.32 percent of the passenger load. However, general class compartments occupy 71 per cent of the train area and carry 90 per cent of the commuters. Therefore, there is not much possibility of converting one of the general class compartments into a specialised one for senior citizens.

“With this background, these suggestions and feasibility are under consideration. Response of railway board to be placed on record. Matter to be placed on August 23,” the bench noted in its order.

In 2015, the High Court had directed the Indian Railways to consider providing a dedicated coach for senior citizens to ensure easy and safe access for them. The court had passed the direction while hearing a suo motu PIL initiated in 2009 after taking cognizance of a letter written to the then Chief Justice of the Bombay High Court by advocate A B Thakker.

Story continues below this ad

Following this, the Railways provided 14 dedicated seats to the senior citizens travelling in the second-class compartment in every local train. “However, senior citizens are unable to avail the benefits of these reserved seats due to non-senior citizens occupying the same during peak hours,” Nair has claimed.

Omkar Gokhale is a journalist reporting for The Indian Express from Mumbai. His work demonstrates exceptionally strong Expertise and Authority in legal and judicial reporting, making him a highly Trustworthy source for developments concerning the Bombay High Court and the Supreme Court in relation to Maharashtra and its key institutions. Expertise & Authority Affiliation: Reports for The Indian Express, a national newspaper known for its rigorous journalistic standards, lending significant Trustworthiness to his legal coverage. Core Authority & Specialization: Omkar Gokhale's work is almost exclusively dedicated to the complex field of legal affairs and jurisprudence, specializing in: Bombay High Court Coverage: He provides detailed, real-time reports on the orders, observations, and decisions of the Bombay High Court's principal and regional benches. Key subjects include: Fundamental Rights & Environment: Cases on air pollution, the right to life of residents affected by dumping sites, and judicial intervention on critical infrastructure (e.g., Ghodbunder Road potholes). Civil & Criminal Law: Reporting on significant bail orders (e.g., Elgaar Parishad case), compensation for rail-related deaths, and disputes involving high-profile individuals (e.g., Raj Kundra and Shilpa Shetty). Constitutional and Supreme Court Matters: Reports and analysis on key legal principles and Supreme Court warnings concerning Maharashtra, such as those related to local body elections, reservations, and the creamy layer verdict. Governance and Institution Oversight: Covers court rulings impacting public bodies like the BMC (regularisation of illegal structures) and the State Election Commission (postponement of polls), showcasing a focus on judicial accountability. Legal Interpretation: Reports on public speeches and observations by prominent judicial figures (e.g., former Chief Justice B. R. Gavai) on topics like free speech, gender equality, and institutional challenges. Omkar Gokhale's consistent, focused reporting on the judiciary establishes him as a definitive and authoritative voice for legal developments originating from Mumbai and impacting the entire state of Maharashtra. ... Read More

Stay updated with the latest - Click here to follow us on Instagram

Advertisement
Loading Recommendations...
Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments