- India vs Pakistan Live Cricket Score, Asia Cup 2018 Ind vs Pak Live Score Streaming: Pakistan off to steady start with bat
- India vs Pakistan Live Cricket Score Streaming Asia Cup 2018 Live Streaming: When and where to watch Ind vs Pak Live broadcast
- India vs Pakistan Asia Cup 2018 Super 4 Live Cricket score streaming: Watch Ind vs Pak Match Live Stream on Hotstar, JioTV and Airtel TV
A day after the Nagpur bench of the Bombay High Court their petition, the directors of Mumbai-based company FA Constructions, who were booked in connection with an irrigation scam in February, have withdrawn their plea.
The company’s lawyers Shashank Manohar and Shyam Devani argued that their clients were made scapegoats in the political tug-of-war between the previous and the current state governments.
Manohar also argued that while five directors of FA Constructions were booked in the Ghodazari irrigation canal project case, only one director had actually operated through power of attorney for the other four.
- Ludhiana city centre scam: Court dismisses ex-SSP’s plea against clean chit to Captain Amarinder Singh
- Vidarbha irrigation scam: Two more offences registered
- ACB books 13 people, including ex-officials, in 2 more irrigation scam cases in Vidarbha
- Nitin Gadkari’s former OSD among six named in irrigation scam chargesheet
- Another irrigation scam in Vidarbha: ACB books 9 VIDC, firm offficials for corruption
- ‘Considerable progress’ in probe into 4 major irrigation scams, state tells Bombay HC
The directors were booked along with two senior engineers of the Vidarbha Irrigation Development Corporation (VIDC) on February 23, following a report by Anti-Corruption Bureau (ACB) finding them guilty for misrepresenting facts to win the tender for the project by irregular means.
They were found to have “forged the documents, formed cartel and duped the government as well as VIDC.”
Acting Advocate General Rohit Deo told the Nagpur Bench of Justice Bhushan Gavai and Justice Swapna Joshi that only FIR and not chargesheet has been filed in the case till date.
“No arrests have been made and proper notice would be given in advance before any arrest could be made,” Deo said.
The Bench then asked the petitioner to either withdraw their plea or they would dismiss it. The petitioners preferred to withdraw the plea.