scorecardresearch
Follow Us:
Friday, March 05, 2021

Bombay HC seeks answer to PIL against non-transfer of mangrove areas to forest department

After hearing submissions, the bench directed the respondent collectors and authorities to file their responses within three weeks and posted hearing on the PIL thereafter.

By: Express News Service | Mumbai |
January 22, 2021 11:47:43 pm
Bombay HC asks Maharashtra govt to revisit its decision on virtually holding civic body meetingsThe Bombay High Court on Monday directed the Maharashtra government to revisit a decision by its Urban Development Department of allowing Municipal General Body meetings to be held through video conferencing. (File)

The Bombay High Court on Friday asked the collectors of the seven coastal districts, along with the Mumbai Metropolitan Region Development Authority (MMRDA), City and Industrial Development Corporation (CIDCO) and Jawaharlal Nehru Port Trust (JNPT), to state why they have not complied with its September 2018 order wherein it had directed all mangrove areas to be declared forests and transferred to the forest department.

A division bench of Justice AA Sayed and Justice Madhav J Jamdar was hearing a public interest litigation (PIL), filed by NGO Vanashakti, which had claimed “willful negligence” by the authorities to facilitate misuse of large stretches of mangrove land for vested interests and had sought to transfer nearly 1,600 hectares of such land to the forest department.

The NGO sought directions to immediately initiate the transfer and handover nearly mangrove land under the areas of the said district collectors to revenue and forest department and chief conservator of forest, mangrove cell.

The PIL claimed that while nearly 15,311.7 hectares of mangrove land came under the 2018 order’s ambit, a total of 13,716.73 hectares were transferred to the revenue and forest department. However, 1,594.97 hectares of mangrove area have not been transferred yet. He submitted that the chief conservator of forests had reminded the collectors and the authorities of non-compliance of the high court order but none of them follow it which prompted the NGO to move the PIL before the high court.

In view of this, the PIL also sought initiation of contempt proceedings against errant authorities.

After hearing submissions, the bench directed the respondent collectors and authorities to file their responses within three weeks and posted hearing on the PIL thereafter.

📣 The Indian Express is now on Telegram. Click here to join our channel (@indianexpress) and stay updated with the latest headlines

For all the latest Mumbai News, download Indian Express App.

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement