This is an archive article published on January 27, 2025
Bombay HC suggests mediation in trademark dispute between Abhishek Lodha’s Macrotech and brother’s firm
Justice Arif S Doctor proposes appointing a former chief justice of India or any former judge agreed on by the sons of minister Mangal Prabhat Lodha as a mediator in the case over the use of the trademark 'Lodha'.
The Bombay High Court on Monday suggested that the trademark dispute between Macrotech Developers—formerly Lodha Group—of Abhishek Lodha and his younger brother’s House of Abhinandan Lodha Estate Holdings Private Limited (HoABL) be referred to a mediator. Abhishek and Abhinandan are sons of Maharashtra minister Mangal Prabhat Lodha.
A single-judge bench of Justice Arif S Doctor proposed appointing a former chief justice of India or anyone else (former judge) by the consent of the parties as a mediator in the case. He asked Abhishek Lodha’s counsel Janak Dwarkadas to respond on Tuesday whether his client was willing to attempt to resolve the issue through mediation. The court will decide on the appointment of a mediator during the hearing on Tuesday.
The high court was hearing an interim application by Macrotech seeking ad interim relief in its trademark infringement suitto restrain HoABL from using the “Lodha” trademark pending the hearing of the matter.
“There appears to be a dispute between two brothers. In all matters where there is an element of dispute within a family, the genesis appears to be a dispute between two brothers. Has any serious effort been made before you launch into protracted litigation? Has some effort been made to sit down and resolve it? If a mediation or settlement of dispute is reached, won’t everything else be put to an end?” the judge said.
Senior advocate Darius Khambata, representing Macrotech, argued that besides the loss or damage provisionally estimated to be more than Rs 5,000 crore due to the use of the “Lodha” by HoABL, the flat purchasers of the firm were approaching Macrotech with complaints, suggesting there was confusion among them regarding the trademark.
Senior advocate Dwarkadas said that several attempts were made to resolve the matter, including an intervention by the litigants’ parents as they don’t “like to see the dispute”. “Naturally so, and it will further precipitate and therefore an attempt can be made to ensure that it does not happen,” the judge responded. He also sought Dwarkadas’s response to the suggestion to appoint a mediator.
In 2015, Abhinandan parted ways with Lodha Group and started HoABL and the separation was formalised on the basis of a family settlement agreement in 2017.
Story continues below this ad
Macrotech claims that due to non-compliance with the 2017 agreement, a new agreement was signed between the two parties in December 2023, which expressly prohibited Abhinandan from using a name similar to Lodha. Macrotech and Digirealty Technologies Pvt Ltd have sought a perpetual injunction against infringing on their registered trademarks and from offering, selling, advertising, distributing, marketing, exhibiting for sale, or otherwise dealing with impugned services or any goods that are the same or similar to the plaintiffs’ goods and services that contain the mark “Lodha”.
Through its interim application, Macrotech has sought urgent direction to the firm owned by Abhinandan to stop using the brand name pending the hearing of the suit. The lawyers representing Abhinandan and his firm denied the claims made by his brother.
Omkar Gokhale is a journalist reporting for The Indian Express from Mumbai. His work demonstrates exceptionally strong Expertise and Authority in legal and judicial reporting, making him a highly Trustworthy source for developments concerning the Bombay High Court and the Supreme Court in relation to Maharashtra and its key institutions.
Expertise & Authority
Affiliation: Reports for The Indian Express, a national newspaper known for its rigorous journalistic standards, lending significant Trustworthiness to his legal coverage.
Core Authority & Specialization: Omkar Gokhale's work is almost exclusively dedicated to the complex field of legal affairs and jurisprudence, specializing in:
Bombay High Court Coverage: He provides detailed, real-time reports on the orders, observations, and decisions of the Bombay High Court's principal and regional benches. Key subjects include:
Fundamental Rights & Environment: Cases on air pollution, the right to life of residents affected by dumping sites, and judicial intervention on critical infrastructure (e.g., Ghodbunder Road potholes).
Civil & Criminal Law: Reporting on significant bail orders (e.g., Elgaar Parishad case), compensation for rail-related deaths, and disputes involving high-profile individuals (e.g., Raj Kundra and Shilpa Shetty).
Constitutional and Supreme Court Matters: Reports and analysis on key legal principles and Supreme Court warnings concerning Maharashtra, such as those related to local body elections, reservations, and the creamy layer verdict.
Governance and Institution Oversight: Covers court rulings impacting public bodies like the BMC (regularisation of illegal structures) and the State Election Commission (postponement of polls), showcasing a focus on judicial accountability.
Legal Interpretation: Reports on public speeches and observations by prominent judicial figures (e.g., former Chief Justice B. R. Gavai) on topics like free speech, gender equality, and institutional challenges.
Omkar Gokhale's consistent, focused reporting on the judiciary establishes him as a definitive and authoritative voice for legal developments originating from Mumbai and impacting the entire state of Maharashtra. ... Read More
