scorecardresearch
Follow Us:
Thursday, May 26, 2022

Activist Sudha Bharadwaj’s plea against NIA to withdraw ‘defamatory’ remarks rejected

Bharadwaj had filed a plea in December, seeking access to unredacted copies of statements of witnesses recorded under section 164 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The NIA, in its reply, had opposed the plea and alleged that access to statements was sought to cause harm to the witnesses.

By: Express News Service | Mumbai |
February 13, 2021 3:09:41 am
Activist Sudha Bharadwaj’s plea against NIA to withdraw ‘defamatory’ remarks rejectedWhile the court had earlier allowed Bharadwaj's plea seeking access to the witness statements, it considered the NIA’s stand opposing withdrawal of the alleged “defamatory” responses. (Express File)

A SPECIAL court on Friday rejected an application by law professor and activist Sudha Bharadwaj that sought directions to the National Investigation Agency (NIA) to withdraw “defamatory” allegations made against her in a written reply filed by the agency.

Bharadwaj had filed a plea in December, seeking access to unredacted copies of statements of witnesses recorded under section 164 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The NIA, in its reply, had opposed the plea and alleged that access to statements was sought to cause harm to the witnesses.

Bharadwaj had then filed a separate plea, seeking that directions be given to NIA to withdraw such allegations. Her plea said that there is absolutely no proof that she would cause harm to any witness and that on the contrary, she has spent over 20 years in the service of people.

The application further said that the court cannot be reduced to a forum where “gossip and slander can be bandied about under the guise of legal arguments”. The NIA had opposed the plea.

Best of Express Premium

UPSC Key – May 26, 2022: Why and What to know about Hawala Transaction to...Premium
BJP big guns to lend Himachal CM Jai Ram Thakur a hand as corruption, fac...Premium
Explained: The message behind Margaret Atwood’s ‘unburnable&#...Premium
Welcome to the elusive world of crypto mining: Rohtak rig, 3 engineers, R...Premium

Special public prosecutor Prakash Shetty submitted to the court that the reply had stated that disclosing information, which can lead to revealing the identities of the accused, could lead to a possibility of threat to their lives and hence, a provision in law is available to protect them. Shetty added that this was not a defamatory statement and hence, the plea should be rejected.

While the court had earlier allowed Bharadwaj’s plea seeking access to the witness statements, it considered the NIA’s stand opposing withdrawal of the alleged “defamatory” responses.

For all the latest Mumbai News, download Indian Express App.

  • Newsguard
  • The Indian Express website has been rated GREEN for its credibility and trustworthiness by Newsguard, a global service that rates news sources for their journalistic standards.
  • Newsguard
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement