Gadling had argued that since the charges against him filed by the police are serious, including sections of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, he needs to make detailed submissions which is not possible with the interruptions and disruptions on VC.
OBSERVING THAT denying permission to advocate Surendra Gadling to argue his discharge application in person, pending for nearly three years in a case in Gadchiroli, would “compound the injustice already caused by the inordinate delay”, a special court in Aheri directed that arrangements be made for him to be produced before it on October 28.
Last month, the Supreme Court had raised the issue of the delay in the proceedings in the 2016 Surjagarh arson case and sought an explanation.
The state government had told the Supreme Court that the delay was due to Gadling’s insistence at being produced physically to argue the discharge plea and said that it was not possible due to security reasons.
Gadling is currently lodged in a jail near Mumbai, as an undertrial in the Elgaar Parishad case.
“The accused (Gadling) has been in custody since 2019 (in the arson case) and has not been physically produced before this court even once during this six-year period. The discharge application itself has been pending for nearly three years. In these circumstances, to deny physical production for purposes of arguing the discharge application would compound the injustice already caused by inordinate delay,” special judge Prakash R Kadam said in an order passed on October 6, made available this week.
“A fair trial necessarily includes the right of an accused to defend himself effectively….While it primarily encompasses the right to engage counsel of one’s choice, it also includes in appropriate circumstances the right to argue one’s case in person,” the court said.
The court directed authorities of the Taloja Central prison to produce Gadling in person before the Gadchiroli court on October 28 and make all necessary arrangements for his safe custody and that of the police team escorting him, during transit and in court.
Story continues below this ad
The case relates to an incident that occured in Gadchiroli on December 25, 2016, when 76 vehicles transporting iron ore from Surjagarh mines were set ablaze. The police had alleged that this was the handiwork of members of banned organisation, CPI (Maoist) and booked Gadling for allegedly aiding the Maoists.
Gadling had filed the discharge plea in 2022 and as a practicing lawyer, who also represented himself in the Mumbai court, sought to be physically produced for the proceedings in the Aheri court.
The police had opposed the plea citing security reasons.
The court heard Gadling on video-conference (VC) on whether he needs to be physically produced. The court observed that during the hearing which went on for about 40 minutes, there were disruptions and disconnections at least 4-5 times in the VC connection and that the infrastructure is “far from ideal”.
“The audio quality fluctuated significantly, rendering portions of the accused’s submissions inaudible or barely comprehensible. This court found itself repeatedly requesting the accused to repeat his points, an exercise both frustrating for the speaker and unsatisfactory for the listener,” the court said.
Story continues below this ad
Gadling had argued that since the charges against him filed by the police are serious, including sections of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, he needs to make detailed submissions which is not possible with the interruptions and disruptions on VC.
The police said that the potential risk in producing him before the court has to be considered, rather than “merely facilitating the accused’s preference” for physical production.
Gadling said that he has been released on temporary bail thrice since 2019 and has stayed in Nagpur then. The court considered these submissions and said that it is not unmindful of the security concerns but they must not restrict the rights of an accused when not backed by specific intelligence or a particular “threat assessment”.
Sadaf Modak is a distinguished Legal Correspondent based in Mumbai whose work demonstrates exceptional Expertise and Authority in covering the intricacies of the judicial and correctional systems. Reporting for The Indian Express, she is a highly Trustworthy source for in-depth coverage of courtroom proceedings and human rights issues.
Expertise
Specialized Role: As a dedicated Legal Correspondent, Sadaf Modak possesses deep, specialized knowledge of legal procedures, statutes, and judicial operations, lending immense Authority to her reports.
Core Authority & Focus: Her work primarily centers on:
Trial Court Proceedings: She mainly covers the trial courts of Mumbai, providing crucial, on-the-ground reporting on the day-to-day legal processes that affect citizens. She maintains a keen eye on both major criminal cases and the "ordinary and not so ordinary events" that reveal the human element within the justice system.
Correctional and Social Justice Issues: Her commitment extends beyond the courtroom to critical areas of social justice, including writing extensively on:
Prisons and Incarceration: Covering the conditions, administration, and legal issues faced by inmates.
Juvenile Justice: Reporting on the complexities of the juvenile justice system and the legal rights of children.
Human Rights: Focusing on fundamental human rights within the context of law enforcement and state institutions.
Experience
Institutional Affiliation: Reporting for The Indian Express—a leading national newspaper—ensures her coverage is subject to high editorial standards of accuracy, impartiality, and legal rigor.
Impactful Detail: Her focus on trial courts provides readers with direct, detailed insights into the workings of the justice system, making complex legal narratives accessible and establishing her as a reliable and trusted chronicler of the legal landscape.
Sadaf Modak's blend of judicial focus and commitment to human rights issues establishes her as a vital and authoritative voice in Indian legal journalism.
She tweets @sadafmodak ... Read More
4 min read
