Stay updated with the latest - Click here to follow us on Instagram
The court stated that it is alarming to note that a person with a criminal history of 14 cases and convicted in four cases obtained the licence to practice law. (File)
The Allahabad High Court has directed the Uttar Pradesh government and the state Bar Council to ensure that a person having criminal cases against him or her does not get the licence to practice law.
The court passed the direction on December 21, while hearing the petition filed by Pawan Kumar Dubey seeking a direction to Bar Council of Uttar Pradesh to dispose of his petition pending since September 25 last year.
“Pawan Kumar Dubey had filed a complaint with the Bar Council of Uttar Pradesh that a person who obtained licence to practice law had concealed vital information regarding pendency of 14 criminal cases, of which he was convicted in four cases,” said Dubey’s lawyer Surendra Chandra Dwivedi.
A division bench of Justices Vinod Diwakar and SD Singh stated in its order that, “Whatever be the true facts, at present the complaint appears to be pending with the Bar Council of Uttar Pradesh since 25.9.2022. Much time has passed, appropriate action should have been taken thereon, by now. Accordingly, the instant petition is disposed of with a direction upon respondent no.3 to undertake and complete the disciplinary proceedings brought by the petitioner as expeditiously as possible, preferably, within a period of three months, in accordance with law.”
The court stated that it is alarming to note that a person with a criminal history of 14 cases and convicted in four cases obtained the licence to practice law. “Such a licence, if allowed to arise and/or continue, may cause harm to society in general and the legal fraternity in particular. The Advocates Act prohibits admission of such a person to practice,” it said.
The court observed that respondent no.2 should have developed a procedure to ensure that all fresh applications received for grant of licence are subjected to police verification procedure in a time bound manner.
“All applicants who may be facing criminal charges and/or may have been convicted are bound to inform the Bar Council at the stage of making their applications as to pendency of such cases and/or existence of any order of conviction. If such material particulars are not disclosed by an applicant, his application may be rejected at the threshold. Seen in that light, it is surprising that the Bar Council has yet not evolved a procedure to enforce its own law,” the bench observed.
The court directed respondents 1 and 2 to issue necessary directions and seek a police report from the police stations concerned regarding all pending and fresh applications for issuing licence similar to the procedures “being done/followed for issuance of passports”.
“Such due diligence procedure would ensure that a person who may carry a criminal history and who may conceal that information, be prevented from misleading the Bar Council in obtaining a licence. A provisional licence issued pending an adverse police report may be cancelled upon such report being submitted,” it held.
Stay updated with the latest - Click here to follow us on Instagram