4 min readHyderabadUpdated: Jan 31, 2026 05:24 AM IST
On Friday, the SIT served a second notice to the former CM, stating that his questioning in the case can happen at his official residence at Nandi Nagar in Hyderabad, which they said is within the permitted jurisdiction. (Express Archive, enhanced using Google Gemini)
The tug of war between former Telangana chief minister K Chandrashekar Rao and the special investigation team (SIT) probing the phone tapping case continued for a second day over where he should be questioned and when.
On Friday, the SIT served a second notice to the former CM, stating that his questioning in the case can happen at his official residence at Nandi Nagar in Hyderabad, which they said is within the permitted jurisdiction. He cannot be questioned at his Erravalli farmhouse, which is in Siddipet, about 60 km from Hyderabad, the SIT informed him. His questioning will have to happen on February 1 at 3 pm, the second SIT notice said.
The notice read, “Considering your age and in view of the provision of section 160 CrPC, the undersigned had offered to undertake the investigation at your residential address as per records…The request for examination at a place which is not your official residence as per official records cannot be acceded to, as the venue of examination is determined with reference to the ordinary place of residence reflected in official records.” According to the SIT, the former CM’s official residence, as per an election affidavit and a Writ petition filed by him, is the one in Nandi Nagar.
The notice further said, “As the examination involves reference to many electronic and physical records which are sensitive in nature, it would be administratively difficult to transport the same to Erravalli village. You are therefore requested to make yourself available at your residence in Hyderabad for examination…”
After the SIT sent him its first notice on Thursday, KCR had replied that the team could examine him “at his station of residence”, which is the Erravalli farmhouse. Also, in view of nominations being filed for municipal and corporation elections, he should be examined at a later “convenient” date and not January 30, KCR had said in his reply.
In Thursday’s notice, the SIT had asked KCR to appear before it to record his statement regarding the alleged tapping of phones when his Bharat Rashtra Samithi (BRS) government was in power in Telangana. It had asked KCR to record his statement on January 30 at 3 pm.
The first notice was served at KCR’s residence at Nandi Nagar under CrPC section 160, which empowers an investigating officer to formally summon someone. KCR’s summons had come after the SIT recorded the statements of his son, K T Rama Rao, and nephews, T Harish Rao and Joginipally Santosh Kumar.
Story continues below this ad
Those accused in the phone tapping case so far are former Special Intelligence Branch (SIB) chief and IPS officer T Prabhakar Rao, Deputy Superintendent of Police D Praneeth Rao, Additional Superintendents of Police M Thirupathanna and N Bhujanga Rao, former Superintendent of Police P Radhakishan Rao, and a TV channel owner, A Shravan Kumar Rao.
SIT sources had earlier told The Indian Express that there is evidence to prove that at least 600 phone numbers, which were tapped by the SIB under Prabhakar Rao, were not related to Left-wing extremism. The SIB was set up in 1990 to track and prevent the activities of the banned Communist Party of India (Maoist). SIT sources had also said that the probe has widened to include illegal access to call data records and Internet Protocol data records of thousands of people from different walks of life.
The first notice issued to KCR, signed by P Venkatagiri, Assistant Commissioner of Police, Jubilee Hills Division, claimed that during the course of the investigation, it was revealed that the former CM was acquainted with facts and circumstances relevant to the case. “Your examination is therefore necessary and required for the purpose of further investigation,” the notice said.
Nikhila Henry is an Assistant Editor at The Indian Express, based in Hyderabad. With a career spanning 17 years, she has established herself as an authoritative voice on South Indian affairs, specialising in the complex intersections of politics, education, and social justice.
Experience & Career: Nikhila commenced her journalism career in 2007 as an education correspondent for The Times of India in Hyderabad,where she gained recognition for her coverage of student politics. Her professional trajectory includes a four-year tenure at The Hindu, where she focused on minority affairs and social welfare. In 2019, she took on a leadership role as the South Bureau Chief for The Quint, where she directed regional coverage across all five South Indian states. Her expansive career also includes a tenure at the BBC in New Delhi and contributions to prestigious international outlets such as The Sunday Times (London) and HuffPost India.
Expertise & Focus Areas
Nikhila’s reportage is marked by a deep-seated understanding of grassroots movements and institutional policy. Her core focus areas include:
Regional Politics: Comprehensive analysis of the socio-political dynamics across South India.
Education & Student Movements: Chronicling the evolution of Indian academics and the rise of youth activism.
Minority Affairs: Rigorous reporting on the welfare, rights, and challenges facing marginalized communities.
National Beat: Elevating regional stories to national prominence through investigative and on-ground reporting.
Authoritativeness & Trust
A respected figure in Indian media, Nikhila is not only a seasoned reporter but also an accomplished author and editor. She authored the critically acclaimed book The Ferment: Youth Unrest in India and edited Caste is Not a Rumour, a collection of writings by Rohith Vemula. Her dual background in daily news reporting and long-form authorship allows her to provide readers with a nuanced, historically-informed perspective on contemporary Indian society.
Find all stories by Nikhila Henry here. ... Read More