Premium
This is an archive article published on December 3, 2024

SC to farmers: Can engage in peaceful protests, but don’t inconvenience public

The plea alleged that Dallewal was “unlawfully detained” from the Khanauri border point on November 26, shortly before he was to commence a fast unto death demanding that the government accept the demands of farmers.

SC to farmers: Can engage in peaceful protests, but don’t inconvenience publicFarmers' group crosses barricades, while marching towards Delhi. (Express Photo by Abhinav Saha)

The Supreme Court Monday asked agitating farmers who were marching towards Delhi not to cause inconvenience to the public. “In a democratic setup, you can engage in peaceful protests but do not cause inconvenience to people”, Justice Surya Kant, presiding over a two-judge bench, remarked.

The bench, also comprising Justice Ujjal Bhuyan, was hearing a habeas corpus petition filed on behalf of farmer leader and chief of Samyukta Kisan Morcha (non-political) Jagjit Singh Dallewal.

The plea alleged that Dallewal was “unlawfully detained” from the Khanauri border point on November 26, shortly before he was to commence a fast unto death demanding that the government accept the demands of farmers.

The plea claimed that Dallewal was “incommunicado and untraceable” for four days since then. It added that “the State, Union and its authorities are setting a tyrannical precedent by unlawfully detaining Mr Jagjit Singh Dallewal which is against the spirit of constitutional morality and the basic structure of the Constitution of India.”

On Monday, the court was told that he was “no more in alleged illegal custody”.

Taking note, the bench remarked: “We have seen that he has been released and he even persuaded a fellow protester to end his fast-unto-death protest on Saturday.”

Disposing of the petition, the SC bench once again underlined the need for maintaining public order.

Story continues below this ad

Underlining that “the Khanauri border is a lifeline for Punjab”, the court clarified that “we are not commenting on whether the protest is right or wrong”.

Justice Kant remarked that Dallewal could persuade fellow protesters to keep their agitation within the bounds of the law without disrupting the daily lives of citizens.

The court also pointed out that the farmers’ grievances were already before the court in another matter dealing with the opening of the Singhu border. Though it said it is not entertaining the plea now, the court left it open for Dallewal to approach it in the future if needed.

Stay updated with the latest - Click here to follow us on Instagram

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments
Advertisement
Loading Taboola...
Advertisement