scorecardresearch
Follow Us:
Monday, August 08, 2022

Supreme Court dismisses plea on review of Shaheen Bagh judgment

"The right to protest cannot be anytime and everywhere. There may be some spontaneous protests but in case of prolonged dissent or protest, there cannot be continued occupation of public place,” a bench of Justices S K Kaul, Aniruddha Bose and Krishna Murari said in its February 9 order.

By: Express News Service | New Delhi |
Updated: February 14, 2021 7:08:52 am
shaheen bagh, supreme court on shaheen bagh, shaheen bagh news, supreme court, delhi violence, delhiProtests against the Citizenship (Amendment) Act in New Delhi’s Shaheen Bagh. (Express file photo)

The Supreme Court has dismissed petitions seeking review of its judgment in the case concerning the Shaheen Bagh anti-CAA protests, reiterating that the Constitutional guarantee of the right to protest comes with certain duties and there cannot be continued occupation of a public place in case of prolonged dissent or protest.

“We have considered the earlier judicial pronouncements and recorded our opinion that the Constitutional scheme comes with a right to protest and express dissent but with an obligation to have certain duties. The right to protest cannot be anytime and everywhere. There may be some spontaneous protests but in case of prolonged dissent or protest, there cannot be continued occupation of public place,” a bench of Justices S K Kaul, Aniruddha Bose and Krishna Murari said in its February 9 order.

“We have perused the review petition and record of the civil appeal and are convinced that the order, of which review has been sought, does not suffer from any error apparent warranting its reconsideration,” the bench said, rejecting the review petition.

In its October 7, 2020 judgment in the matter, the SC, while expressing its strong disapproval of the manner in which the protests against the Citizenship Amendment Act were organised in Shaheen Bagh, had ruled that protests must be carried out “in designated areas alone” and “public ways and public spaces cannot be occupied.. and that too indefinitely”.

Subscriber Only Stories
UPSC Key-August 8, 2022: Why you should read ‘NITI Aayog’ or ‘Bottom-up A...Premium
Post for Tejashwi holds RJD hand, BJP waits and watchesPremium
UPSC Essentials: Key terms of the past week with MCQsPremium
C Raja Mohan writes | India, Bangladesh, Pakistan: What east can teach westPremium

“… while appreciating the existence of the right to peaceful protest against a legislation…we have to make it unequivocally clear that public ways and public spaces cannot be occupied in such a manner and that too indefinitely,” the bench of Justices Sanjay Kishan Kaul, Aniruddha Bose and Krishna Murari had said, while deciding petitions that had sought removal of the protesters for causing traffic jams in areas in and around the national capital.

The bench said that “democracy and dissent go hand in hand, but then the demonstrations expressing dissent have to be in designated places alone”.

The Shaheen Bagh protest, it said, “was not even one of protests taking place in an undesignated area, but was a blockage of a public way which caused grave inconvenience to commuters” and added that “we cannot accept the plea of the applicants (who had sought to intervene in the matter in defence of the protesters) that an indeterminable number of people can assemble whenever they choose to protest”.

“We have, thus, no hesitation in concluding that such kind of occupation of public ways, whether at the site in question or anywhere else for protests is not acceptable and the administration ought to take action to keep the areas clear of encroachments or obstructions,” said the bench.

TWO IS ALWAYS BETTER | Our two-year subscription package offers you more at less

📣 Join our Telegram channel (The Indian Express) for the latest news and updates

For all the latest Delhi News, download Indian Express App.

  • Newsguard
  • The Indian Express website has been rated GREEN for its credibility and trustworthiness by Newsguard, a global service that rates news sources for their journalistic standards.
  • Newsguard
First published on: 14-02-2021 at 12:44:05 am

Featured Stories

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement