Follow Us:
Monday, July 04, 2022

Removal of police cover to lawyer act of vendetta: Riots case judge

The court also directed the DCP (South) to arrange for the security of the special public prosecutor in the case.

New Delhi |
February 8, 2014 2:37:02 am

A trial in one of the 1984 anti-Sikh riots case, which has been on for the past 22 years, was put into fast-track mode on Friday. A sessions court declared that the proceedings in the case will be conducted on a daily basis from February 24. The court also directed the DCP (South) to arrange for the security of the special public prosecutor in the case.

The special public prosecutor B S Joon had submitted an application alleging that police officers at the Nangloi police station had destroyed important records in the case in order to aid the accused.

The court had sought replies from the DCP (Legal) and the DCP (West) on the issue.
Meanwhile, Joon on Monday had sought to withdraw himself from the case, claiming that the Delhi Police had withdrawn his security without prior notice. He also mentioned that he was “under pressure” not to pursue the issue of destruction of records.

On Friday, Additional Sessions Judge Kamini Lau took police to task for withdrawing the protection. Police said security was withdrawn as Joon had retired as the director of prosecution on January 31.

Best of Express Premium
ExplainSpeaking: Despite the fall, are Indian stock markets still overval...Premium
‘Peter Brook tried to destroy, recreate us. I wasn’t willing to be destro...Premium
In Gujarat, Covid crisis brings estranged couples together for second chancePremium
Many scenarios, similar outcome: Tuticorin plant may not restart, say exp...Premium

But Judge Lau said the removal of security at the time when the prosecutor was alleging destruction of evidence by police was “an interesting coincidence” and appeared to be “an act of vendetta” on the part of police.

The court directed DCP (South) to consider arranging Joon’s security on the grounds that he was still a special public prosecutor in the 1984 anti-Sikh riots case.

Judge Lau also said the replies filed by the DCP (Legal) regarding the procedure on destruction of police records was not complete. A week’s time was given to the department to submit a satisfactory response.

Joon told the court that key evidence, including inquest reports, logbook entries, kalandras, non-cognisable offence register, were missing and he believed they were destroyed by the then SHO and ACP of Nangloi police station.

Judge Lau asked Joon to submit in writing by February 14 the documents that he believed were destroyed by police and how these documents could be considered as an evidence in the present case.

JULY 4 SALE! Only for our international readers, monthly pricing starting at just $2.50

📣 Join our Telegram channel (The Indian Express) for the latest news and updates

For all the latest Delhi News, download Indian Express App.

  • Newsguard
  • The Indian Express website has been rated GREEN for its credibility and trustworthiness by Newsguard, a global service that rates news sources for their journalistic standards.
  • Newsguard