Premium

Why Delhi Police wants trials in jail: Gangsters turning court appearances into Instagram Reel opportunities

The Delhi Police have secured convictions in only 2% or 3 cases of the 108 where charges have been framed against criminal gang members so far. 10 cases have resulted in acquittal or discharge.

Delhi PolicePolice also said there would be fewer opportunities or grounds for these criminals to seek bail on grounds of delay, better control over safety and security measures

To stop gangsters from turning their courtroom commutes into viral moments that end up on Instagram, the Delhi Police has pitched an unusual fix: hold their trials right inside jail.

With over 60% of criminal gang cases still stuck at the charges stage, police have requested the Supreme Court to examine if dedicated court complexes can be established within jail premises.

In an affidavit filed Wednesday, DCP (Outer North) Hareshwar V Swami said one of the reasons for the proposition is to reduce “opportunities for generation of reels and other social media content glamourising lives of criminals, which are observed when gang-related criminals are transported from jails to court complexes”.

Police also said there would be fewer opportunities or grounds for these criminals to seek bail on grounds of delay, better control over safety and security measures — including for witnesses and accused persons — and “timely invocation of special statutes” such as the Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act (MCOCA), the National Security Act (NSA), etc, if dedicated court complexes are set up inside jail premises.

Additional Solicitor General S D Sanjay appeared on behalf of the Delhi Police during the hearing on Thursday.

In March, the apex court suggested setting up special courts to try such criminals.

“… in the larger interest of society, it is imperative upon authorities to evolve a mechanism to provide a speedy and time-bound trial. One of the effective recourses could be to establish special courts to conclude trials on a day-to-day basis. A clear mandate can be fixed for such courts that, regardless of the attempts, if any, made by the defence counsel to prolong the trial, the court will proceed with it and conclude the same within the prescribed timeline,” the court said in its March 19 order.

Story continues below this ad

The Delhi Police, in the affidavit, said the primary reason for delays in conducting trial proceedings is that presently, “designated courts handle other routine matters such as IPC/BNS offences, EOW matters, ED cases, etc, burdening them with multiple sensitive matters”.

They have also attributed the delay to the fact that most cases registered against these gang members are under the Indian Penal Code (IPC), and are being tried under Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) whereas it is the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) that includes provisions of speedy and expeditious trial, which remains unavailable “for majority of trials”.

Police have secured convictions in only 2% or 3 cases of the 108 where charges have been framed against criminal gang members so far. And 10 cases have resulted in acquittal or discharge.

Over 80% (89) of the 108 cases are currently at the stage of prosecution evidence. A total of 288 cases are pending against these gang members, with 180 cases in which charges have not been framed yet.

Story continues below this ad

According to the Delhi Police, the average time taken for disposing of the 13 cases that resulted in an outcome — either conviction/acquittal/discharge — was two years after the charges were framed.

In April, the SC was informed that 95 organised criminal gangs have been identified in Delhi, comprising an aggregate of 1,109 members, all of whom are presently undergoing trial proceedings.

Last November, the top court expressed concern that hardened criminals commit crimes while out on bail, which is often granted on the grounds of a delay in trial. The SC’s observation had come while dealing with a bail plea by gangster Mahesh Khatri alias Bholi. While refusing him bail, the court noted that the oldest case against him, dating back to 2013, remains pending to date.

Sohini Ghosh is a Senior Correspondent at The Indian Express. Previously based in Ahmedabad covering Gujarat, she recently moved to the New Delhi bureau, where she primarily covers legal developments at the Delhi High Court Professional Profile Background: An alumna of the Asian College of Journalism (ACJ), she previously worked with ET NOW before joining The Indian Express. Core Beats: Her reporting is currently centered on the Delhi High Court, with a focus on high-profile constitutional disputes, disputes over intellectual property, criminal and civil cases, issues of human rights and regulatory law (especially in the areas of technology and healthcare). Earlier Specialty: In Gujarat, she was known for her rigorous coverage in the beats of crime, law and policy, and social justice issues, including the 2002 riot cases, 2008 serial bomb blast case, 2016 flogging of Dalits in Una, among others. She has extensively covered health in the state, including being part of the team that revealed the segregation of wards at the state’s largest government hospital on lines of faith in April 2020. With Ahmedabad being a UNESCO heritage city, she has widely covered urban development and heritage issues, including the redevelopment of the Sabarmati Ashram Recent Notable Articles (Late 2025) Her recent reporting from the Delhi High Court covers major political, constitutional, corporate, and public-interest legal battles: High-Profile Case Coverage She has extensively covered the various legal battles - including for compensation under the aegis of North East Delhi Riots Claims Commission - pertaining to the 2020 northeast Delhi riots, as well as 1984 anti-Sikh riots. She has also led coverage at the intersection of technology and governance, and its impact on the citizenry, from, and beyond courtrooms — such as the government’s stakeholder consultations for framing AI-Deepfake policy. Signature Style Sohini is recognized for her sustained reporting from courtrooms and beyond. She specialises in breaking down dense legal arguments to make legalese accessible for readers. Her transition from Gujarat to Delhi has seen her expand her coverage on regulatory, corporate and intellectual property law, while maintaining a strong commitment to human rights and lacuna in the criminal justice system. X (Twitter): @thanda_ghosh ... Read More

Stay updated with the latest - Click here to follow us on Instagram

Advertisement
Loading Recommendations...
Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments