scorecardresearch
Follow Us:
Wednesday, August 17, 2022

No change in bench, NJAC hearing from April 27

The five-judge bench decided to go ahead with the proceedings without any further recusal by any of the judges.

By: Express News Service | New Delhi |
April 23, 2015 1:25:35 am
Supreme Court, NJAC case, Supreme Court NJAC, National Judicial Appointments Commission, SC collegium system, collegium system, Judges collegium system, Supreme court collegium, SC NJAC, NJAC judges panel, Chief Justice of India, Justice J S Khehar, Mukul Rohatgi, AG Mukul Rohatgi, BJP government, NDA government, Narendra Modi, india news, nation news The bench asked Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi to take instructions from the government regarding the judges’ appointment in the interim

Putting to rest contentions regarding conflict of interests, a Constitution Bench headed by Justice J S Khehar will commence from Monday its hearing on validity of the Constitutional amendment and setting up of the National Judicial Appointments Commission (NJAC) after scrapping collegium.

The five-judge bench decided to go ahead with the proceedings without any further recusal by any of the judges after hearing all the objections and eventually holding that there was no good reason for Justice Khehar to recuse.

[related-post]

The decision was called for as an issue was raised whether conflict of interests and doctrine of bias should prevent Justice Khehar from heading the bench since he was a member of the collegium and was also slated to become the Chief Justice of India. Justice Khehar had declared Tuesday that after his name was decided to head the bench, he wrote to the CJI that he will not be a part of either the NJAC or the collegium till this case is decided.

Subscriber Only Stories
Crypto romance scams: ‘Asian women’ on Twitter are coming for...Premium
Cheetahs are set to arrive in India, what the big cats have to sayPremium
Delhi Confidential: Health Minister Mansukh Mandaviya earns praise from C...Premium
Delhi Police in RTI reply: 80% match in facial recognition is deemed posi...Premium

On April 15, Justice Anil R Dave, who headed the previous five-judge bench, had recused from hearing the case following an objection that he was an ex-officio member of the NJAC owing to his seniority in the top court.

“Justice J S Khehar will not recuse himself from hearing,” pronounced Justice J Chelameswar on behalf of the Bench as it brushed aside all objections.

The bench, also comprising Justices Madan B Lokur, Kurian Joseph and Adarsh Kumar Goel, issued formal notices to the Centre, all state governments and Union Territories, asking them to be ready with the matter which they said “purely involves the questions of law”.

The bench asked Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi to take instructions from the government regarding the judges’ appointment in the interim, particularly about confirmation of additional judges in high courts whose tenure will end in the immediate future.

Advertisement

The AG’s views were sought as he told the bench that the collegium did not exist as on date and that “it is gone.” Rohatgi added that the government would constitute the NJAC “very very soon.”

A consensus was arrived at that the petition filed by the Supreme Court Advocates on Record Association (SCAORA), in which senior advocate Fali S Nariman is appearing, will be the lead case among the batch of petitions on this point.

The Attorney General will be the lead counsel to defend the law which has got support from the Supreme Court Bar Association and states like Madhya Pradesh and Haryana for which senior counsel K K Venugopal and Harish Salve appeared.

Advertisement

The AG said that the government sat overnight to clear 95 per cent of the recommendations made by the collegium just a couple of days before the NJAC Act was notified on April 13.

📣 Join our Telegram channel (The Indian Express) for the latest news and updates

For all the latest Delhi News, download Indian Express App.

  • Newsguard
  • The Indian Express website has been rated GREEN for its credibility and trustworthiness by Newsguard, a global service that rates news sources for their journalistic standards.
  • Newsguard
First published on: 23-04-2015 at 01:25:35 am

Featured Stories

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement