Master Plan for Delhi 2047: Once DDA notifies area for town planning, participation must

The revised policy is intended to make land assembly workable, open up more developable land and bring planned housing to the city.

DelhiUnder the existing system, private landowners assemble their parcels for development. (file)

The Master Plan for Delhi (MPD)-2047 has introduced town planning schemes (TPS) as an alternative under the existing land pooling policy – as per which it is mandatory for landowners in a particular area to pool their land together – allowing the Delhi Development Authority (DDA) to require landowners in notified areas to participate in planned development.

The move is aimed at overcoming the disputes and delays that have stalled the policy for years. The DDA sees land pooling as a key route to address the city’s housing shortage, with the potential to unlock up to 20 lakh homes.

What is land pooling?

Under the existing system, private landowners assemble their parcels for development. They give 40% of the pooled land to the DDA for roads, parks and other public infrastructure, while retaining 60% for residential and commercial development.

Story continues below this ad

Until recently, the DDA would acquire land directly, build flats and amenities such as parks and community centres, and then sell the units. But land acquisition, as per DDA, has become increasingly tedious due to high costs, litigation and procedural delays.

The policy seeks tocreateworld-class neighbourhoods with high-rises in the rural belt of Outer Delhi, such as Narela, Bawana and Najafgarh, where haphazard development is currently underway.

Why has the policy struggled?

It was first introduced in the 2007 Delhi Master Plan-2021. Regulations followed in 2013 and were revised in 2018, covering 138 sectors across six zones. However, eight years on, no work has begun in any sector.

There are several reasons behind it:

  1. Land assembly proved difficult: Owners had to persuade others to participate and prepare layout plans, often resulting in disputes.
  2. Forming a consortium was a hurdle: Landowners of at least 70% of contiguous land in a sector had to come together to form a consortium (a representative body that will take decisions) before a scheme could even be processed. With some sectors covering two or three villages, there were frequent disagreements between landowners.
  3. No fixed timeline for development: Rural landowners were expected to give up their land in exchange for a rise in the value of the property they get in return. However, there was no fixed timeline for when development work would begin.
  4. What has changed?

Under a TPS, landowners assemble parcels under different ownerships, which are then reconstituted after land is deducted for roads, open spaces, social infrastructure and other services.

Story continues below this ad

Most importantly, once the DDA notifies an area under a TPS, participation will be mandatory, unlike the exisiting land pooling scheme. It is a more structured method, which has been used in Gujarat.

Jagan Shah, former head of the National Institute of Urban Affairs and currently Professor of Practice at IIT Delhi, welcomed the availability of different mechanisms to assemble and redevelop urban land. He, however, cautioned, “The DDA has the discretion in selecting areas it notifies under TPS, which gives rise for opportunities of rent-seeking.”

There are several other key changes too:

Forming a consortium is not necessary anymore. Under the new policy, landowners with contiguous parcels above 20 hectares can approach the DDA directly.

  1. Plan permits “any other model” to be specified through future regulations. This gives the DDA flexibility in implementation. “The DDA shall act as a main anchor for preparation of schemes and development of all roads, parks and playgrounds, utilities, services, social infrastructure, social housing etc. as per the approved scheme,” the plan stated.
  2. Land-use changes for individual parcels that do not conform to a consortium’s sector plan will take place automatically.

Why is it needed?

Delhi’s affordable housing supply has collapsed even as its population has grown exponentially.

Story continues below this ad

According to data from real estate consultancy Anarock, the share of newly-launched homes priced below Rs 40 lakh fell from 62% in 2020 to just 11% last year, while units priced above Rs 1.5 crore rose from 13% of new supply in 2019 to 70% in 2024.

Much of the region’s legal housing growth has moved to Gurgaon, Faridabad and Noida, since Delhi lacks regulations for high-density greenfield construction.

This has resulted in unauthorised and haphazard growth on the city’s fringes: internal DDA assessments show over 3,500 hectares – land the size of 4,900 football fields – has come under unauthorised construction in land pooling areas.

The revised policy is intended to make land assembly workable, open up more developable land and bring planned housing to the city.

Devansh Mittal is a Correspondent at The Indian Express, based in the New Delhi City bureau. He reports on urban policy, civic governance, and infrastructure in the National Capital Region, with a growing focus on housing, land policy, transport, and the disruption economy and its social implications. Professional Background Education: He studied Political Science at Ashoka University. Core Beats: His reporting focuses on policy and governance in the National Capital Region, one of the largest urban agglomerations in the world. He covers housing and land policy, municipal governance, urban transport, and the interface between infrastructure, regulation, and everyday life in the city. Recent Notable Work His recent reporting includes in-depth examinations of urban policy and its on-ground consequences: An investigation into subvention-linked home loans that documented how homebuyers were drawn into under-construction projects through a “builder–bank” nexus, often leaving them financially exposed when delivery stalled. A detailed report on why Delhi’s land-pooling policy has remained stalled since 2007, tracing how fragmented land ownership, policy design flaws, and mistrust among stakeholders have kept one of the capital’s flagship urban reforms in limbo. A reported piece examining the collapse of an electric mobility startup and what it meant for women drivers dependent on the platform for livelihoods. Reporting Approach Devansh’s work combines on-ground reporting with analysis of government data, court records, and academic research. He regularly reports from neighbourhoods, government offices, and courtrooms to explain how decisions on housing, transport, and the disruption economy shape everyday life in the city. Contact X (Twitter): @devanshmittal_ Email: devansh.mittal@expressindia.com ... Read More

Stay updated with the latest - Click here to follow us on Instagram

Advertisement
Loading Recommendations...
Advertisement
Advertisement
Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments