Premium
This is an archive article published on November 6, 2023

HC stays summons to Delhi CM’s wife Sunita Kejriwal over name in two voter lists

Metropolitan Magistrate (Tis Hazari) Arjinder Kaur had summoned Sunita Kejriwal on November 18. She had moved the HC seeking quashing of the summoning order.

sunita kejriwal delhi high court summonJohn submitted that in the present case, nothing has been placed on record by the complainant/respondent 2 (Khurana) to show that a false declaration has been made by Sunita Kejriwal. (Express archive)
Listen to this article
HC stays summons to Delhi CM’s wife Sunita Kejriwal over name in two voter lists
x
00:00
1x 1.5x 1.8x

The Delhi High Court Monday stayed till February 1, 2024, an order of a magisterial court summoning Sunita Kejriwal, wife of Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal, for the alleged violation of the Representation of the People Act (RPA) by enrolling in voter lists of two assembly constituencies.

On August 29, Metropolitan Magistrate (Tis Hazari) Arjinder Kaur had summoned Sunita Kejriwal on November 18. She had moved the HC seeking quashing of the summoning order.

While issuing notice to the complainant/respondent no. 2, BJP leader Harish Khurana, on the plea, a single-judge bench of Justice Amit Bansal said Monday, “In the meanwhile there shall be stay of the operation of the impugned (summoning) order till the next date of hearing.” The plea is next listed on February 1, 2024.

Story continues below this ad

Appearing for Sunita Kejriwal, senior advocate Rebecca John pointed to the provisions of the Representation of the People Act to submit that an offence is made out only if a false declaration is made by a person. John submitted that in the present case, nothing has been placed on record by the complainant/respondent 2 (Khurana) to show that a false declaration has been made by Sunita Kejriwal.

John also argued that as per Khurana’s complaint, Sunita Kejriwal had registered her name in two different assembly constituencies –Sahibabad (Ghaziabad) and Chandni Chowk – and that she had “deliberately made false statements and declarations”. John argued that thus it was “incumbent on the complainant to show this.”

According to Section 17 of the RPA (1950), no person can be registered in the electoral roll for more than one constituency.

In the summoning order, the magistrate had said, “After considering the testimony of the complainant and other witnesses, this court is of the considered opinion that prima facie case is made out against the accused person, namely Sunita Kejriwal, w/o Arvind Kejriwal, for the alleged commission of the offences punishable under Section 31 of the Representation of Peoples Act, 1950. Hence, the accused be summoned accordingly.”

Stay updated with the latest - Click here to follow us on Instagram

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments
Advertisement
Loading Taboola...
Advertisement