Premium

‘A person is dying and you want to file a reply?’ Delhi HC slams insurance firm for denying claim to cancer patient

Keeping in mind the urgency, it posted the matter for consideration on May 14.

insurancePandey is now seeking the court’s direction to the IRDAI to issue comprehensive directions, guidelines, etc, to streamline the process of clearance of cashless medical facilities. (Express File)

On Tuesday afternoon, Santosh Kumar Pandey (53), who was diagnosed with advanced oral cancer, was getting his dressing changed at Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute and Research Centre. Twenty-odd km away, the Delhi High Court was pulling up Pandey’s health insurance company for denying his claim. It directed the firm’s MD to remain present in court on May 14.

The court’s ire came after the insurance firm sought time to file a reply after Pandey’s lawyers, Shubham Bhalla and Alex Noel Dass, told the bench that the company was denying Pandey’s claim on the grounds of him being a tobacco user — despite him not having any such history.

Justice Sachin Datta slammed the insurance company orally, saying, “A person is dying and you want time to file a reply? Ask the (managing) director to be in court next time.”

The court sought a response from the insurance company as well as the insurance regulatory body. Keeping in mind the urgency, it posted the matter for consideration on May 14. It also directed the insurance company’s managing director, Atul Gulati, to remain present before the court on the next date.

Pandey, the sole breadwinner of his family, moved the HC on April 21 with a petition against the Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority of India (IRDAI) and his medical insurance company, Care Health Insurance Limited, for the “illegal, arbitrary rejection” of his valid health insurance claim by Care.

He said he complained about the rejection to IRDAI, which “failed to carry out its statutory duty”.

A resident of Bihar, be was diagnosed with Stage 3 oral/mouth cancer which has affected his mouth, food pipe and wind pipe. He has been suggested a tracheostomy surgery and 35 cycles of chemotherapy. Each cycle comprises two rounds and a booster dose, of which he has only completed four.

Story continues below this ad

Speaking to The Indian Express, his 23-year-old daughter, Shriyanshi, said: “He was 92 kg and within a month, his weight dropped to 56. He has to be admitted on May 6 for immunotherapy treatment. He is scheduled for 200 mg of the medicine; and 100 mg costs Rs 1.90 lakh. He is already on a semi-solid/liquid diet.”

Pandey, who has had health insurance since 2014, was earlier insured by another private company. He got it ported to Care, purchased a plan worth Rs 15 lakh, and continued to regularly pay premiums.

Shriyanshi said, “He switched because he thought there were better benefits (at Care). This was his first insurance claim. We uploaded all requisite documents, but they kept raising queries. It took more than a week for them to communicate their decision — that they had rejected it… we know he has never consumed alcohol or tobacco or any such substance. We made over 200 calls, and all they kept saying was ‘call us during working hours’. When I called during working hours, they either would not respond and would say ‘we’re processing’… We have already spent around Rs 20 lakh by now. We would earlier tell him there is no point in taking insurance, and see how it’s playing out now.”

“I was preparing for UPSC exams, but now I don’t know what to do. I’m running around hospitals while my mother is taking care of my father’s daily needs,” she added.

Story continues below this ad

Pandey told the court that “… his life span would be drastically reduced to maybe around 3-4 months” if he does not receive immediate treatment.

“The treatment is very expensive and can be covered by the petitioner’s insurance policy. But the petitioner can’t pay… out of his own pocket as he is employed as a Sr. Assistant with an employee’s cooperative society and all his savings have been used for educating his daughter,” the court was told.

His insurance company had rejected his claim, stating “discrepancy in medical documents – “personal habit of tobacco” — due to which he was forced to get himself discharged from the hospital, having exhausted his financial savings after clearing hospital expenses, the plea said.

Pandey pointed out that the hospital in January had confirmed, following tests, that his lungs were fine.

Story continues below this ad

He also said the rejection “has left him in life-threatening situation, which would not have arisen if appropriate rules, guidelines, etc. had been issued by (IRDAI) regulating cashless insurance facility.”

Pandey is now seeking the court’s direction to the IRDAI to issue comprehensive directions, guidelines, etc, to streamline the process of clearance of cashless medical facilities.

He is also seeking that his claim denial be set aside and that the insurance claim of Rs 20,81,000 incurred by him so far be honoured. In addition, he sought that he be paid Rs 10 lakh as compensation for the mental agony and harassment he had to undergo.

Sohini Ghosh is a Senior Correspondent at The Indian Express. Previously based in Ahmedabad covering Gujarat, she recently moved to the New Delhi bureau, where she primarily covers legal developments at the Delhi High Court Professional Profile Background: An alumna of the Asian College of Journalism (ACJ), she previously worked with ET NOW before joining The Indian Express. Core Beats: Her reporting is currently centered on the Delhi High Court, with a focus on high-profile constitutional disputes, disputes over intellectual property, criminal and civil cases, issues of human rights and regulatory law (especially in the areas of technology and healthcare). Earlier Specialty: In Gujarat, she was known for her rigorous coverage in the beats of crime, law and policy, and social justice issues, including the 2002 riot cases, 2008 serial bomb blast case, 2016 flogging of Dalits in Una, among others. She has extensively covered health in the state, including being part of the team that revealed the segregation of wards at the state’s largest government hospital on lines of faith in April 2020. With Ahmedabad being a UNESCO heritage city, she has widely covered urban development and heritage issues, including the redevelopment of the Sabarmati Ashram Recent Notable Articles (Late 2025) Her recent reporting from the Delhi High Court covers major political, constitutional, corporate, and public-interest legal battles: High-Profile Case Coverage She has extensively covered the various legal battles - including for compensation under the aegis of North East Delhi Riots Claims Commission - pertaining to the 2020 northeast Delhi riots, as well as 1984 anti-Sikh riots. She has also led coverage at the intersection of technology and governance, and its impact on the citizenry, from, and beyond courtrooms — such as the government’s stakeholder consultations for framing AI-Deepfake policy. Signature Style Sohini is recognized for her sustained reporting from courtrooms and beyond. She specialises in breaking down dense legal arguments to make legalese accessible for readers. Her transition from Gujarat to Delhi has seen her expand her coverage on regulatory, corporate and intellectual property law, while maintaining a strong commitment to human rights and lacuna in the criminal justice system. X (Twitter): @thanda_ghosh ... Read More

Stay updated with the latest - Click here to follow us on Instagram

Advertisement
Loading Recommendations...
Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments