scorecardresearch
Follow Us:
Tuesday, August 16, 2022

Diverse voices debate Section 377 judgment

A Panel of diverse voices debated the landmark High Court ruling de-criminalising homosexuality at the India International Centre in New Delhi.

Written by Vaibhav Vats | New Delhi |
July 25, 2009 2:07:04 am

A Panel of diverse voices debated the landmark High Court ruling de-criminalising homosexuality at the India International Centre in New Delhi.

Soli J Sorabjee,former Attorney-General of India,moderated the discussion by asking the panellists to “keep religion out and criticise the judgment on legal and medical grounds”.

Rebutting the argument that homosexuality was an import from the West,he said,“Countries like Nepal and Fiji have decriminalised homosexuality.”

Shohini Ghosh,reader at Jamia Millia Islamia’s Mass Communication Research Centre,said,“It is a momentous judgment as sexual rights are being used to lay claims on citizenship. It has reconfigured the notion of harm,and placed constitutional morality over public morality.”

Subscriber Only Stories
Delhi Confidential: Tiranga selfies campaign a big hit on Independence DayPremium
Bihar berozgari refrain makes way into CM’s job promisePremium
Collegium led by CJI Ramana cleared over 250 for HCs; vacancies now lowes...Premium
PM Modi’s Independence Day targets: corruption, nepotismPremium

Father Dominic Emmanuel,spokesperson of the Delhi Catholic Archdiocese,cited examples from the Bible to make the case that homosexuality is unnatural. He was,however,against discrimination against homosexuals. “The Church has no problem with the striking down of Section 377. We condemn any malice against the community through speech or violence. They must be treated with respect.”

On a lighter note,Ashok Row Kavi,member of UNAIDS,said,“I must congratulate the LGBT community for bringing all religions together for once in the unity they have shown in attacking the judgment.”

Dismissing the notion that homosexuality threatened families,he said,“This judgment has brought families together as we felt excluded earlier. The other important change is that it allows sexual minorities access to public health.”

Advertisement

Shyam Divan,counsel for Naz Foundation during the case,said,“Sexual orientation cannot be stigmatised. In matters of personal agency,society has to remain neutral.”

Commenting on the ruling,he said,“The judgment is extremely well-reasoned and constitutionally consistent.”

📣 Join our Telegram channel (The Indian Express) for the latest news and updates

For all the latest Delhi News, download Indian Express App.

  • Newsguard
  • The Indian Express website has been rated GREEN for its credibility and trustworthiness by Newsguard, a global service that rates news sources for their journalistic standards.
  • Newsguard
First published on: 25-07-2009 at 02:07:04 am

Featured Stories

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement