Stay updated with the latest - Click here to follow us on Instagram
Accused Nishit Kumar Rajendrabhai Patel, who was produced before the court on April 5, told the judge that he was being physically tortured in police custody
A day after a magistrate court directed the station house officer (SHO) of IGI Airport police station to lodge an FIR against Inspector Sumit Kumar in an alleged case of custodial torture of an accused in a case of passport forgery, a sessions court on Wednesday stayed the direction.
“As per record, the Joint CP had sought time for conclusion of the inquiry and even the report from the AIIMS medical board is awaited. In (light of) these facts, the opinion formed by (Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Pranav Joshi) on the oral submissions of the accused without any proper inquiry is not justified,” Additional Sessions Judge Kiran Gupta ordered.
She added that the order dated April 8, passed by Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate (ACJM) Joshi of the Patiala House Court, is stayed till the next date of hearing on May 15.
Accused Nishit Kumar Rajendrabhai Patel, who was produced before the court on April 5, told the judge that he was being physically tortured in police custody. Following this, during a private examination, ACJM Joshi had found bruises on his arms and feet.
ACJM Joshi noted in his order dated April 8 that “prima facie allegations of the physical torture were substantiated”. The court refused to send the accused to the custody of the Delhi Police, which had sought a 10-day remand.
“This court is of the considered opinion that not only the police officials have abused the authority vested in them by law, they have also committed cognizable offence,” he added.
The judge had directed the SHO to register an FIR against Kumar under sections 117 (voluntarily causing grievous hurt), 126 (wrongful restraint) and 119 (voluntarily causing grievous hurt to extort property) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS). He also noted that Dr Aman Gahlot of Indira Gandhi Hospital, who filed the medico-legal report of the accused, appeared to “have conspired with the police officials” by “deliberately ignoring the injuries of the accused” and preparing a false report showing no injuries. The court went on to direct the SHO to book the doctor as well.
Patel, who was represented by advocate Jagdeep Vats, was accused of forging the identity of passport holders to travel to foreign countries illegally.
Stay updated with the latest - Click here to follow us on Instagram