Tuesday, Sep 27, 2022

Delhi HC raps police: Register FIR in rape complaint against Shahnawaz Hussain

Justice Menon said recording of the statement of prosecutrix on four occasions is referred to in the status report filed by the police but there is no explanation as to why the FIR was not lodged.

Appearing for the complainant, advocate Sanjay Kumar Singh said she had been assaulted after the HC order and prayed that protection be granted to her. (File Photo)

The Delhi High Court has criticised the Delhi Police for its “complete reluctance” to even register an FIR against BJP leader Syed Shahnawaz Hussain and directed it to do so forthwith and complete the investigation into the allegations of rape against him within three months.

Upholding a 2018 lower court order directing the police to register an FIR against Hussain, Justice Asha Menon said the complaint sent by the victim to the commissioner of police in 2018 clearly disclosed the cognisable offence of rape “after administration of a stupefying substance” and when the complaint was forwarded to the station house officer, the officer was obligated under law to register the FIR.

“In the present case, till the filing of the complaint before the magistrate on June 21, 2018, the SHO, had done nothing. In fact, the status report filed before this court refers to the said complaint having been received at the police station on June 20, 2018 from the commissioner’s office. The police have a lot to explain for not having registered the FIR on the receipt of the forwarded complaint,” said the court in an order dated August 17.

It added that the direction issued by the trial court for FIR registration can hardly be described as an “irregularity” and therefore calls for no interference.

Subscriber Only Stories
Kurmi club: On national path, Nitish looks east, at UP’s Sonelal Pa...Premium
Interview: MD-CEO, Central bank of India | ‘During PCA years, none of our...Premium
The Kurmis: a political historyPremium
Deepti Sharma and the question of law vs spirit in cricketPremium

Justice Menon also said recording of the statement of prosecutrix on four occasions is referred to in the status report filed by the police but there is no explanation as to why the FIR was not lodged.

“The FIR only puts the machinery into operation. It is a foundation for investigation… It is only after investigations that the police can come to the conclusion whether or not an offence had been committed and if so by whom,” read the order.

Hussain’s lawyer said they were moving the Supreme Court against the High Court’s order.


“The matter was mentioned on Wednesday before the Supreme Court of India for early hearing and the court has allowed the mentioning and directed the matter to be listed next week,” the lawyer said.

“Our client, throughout his life, had an unblemished career and reputation which is being sought to be tarnished on account of false and frivolous allegations in the complaint which the police authorities, after conducting thorough investigation, have themselves found to be untrue,” the lawyer’s press statement said. The statement also called the complaint “false, frivolous, motivated with a view to tarnish the BJP leader’s image and reputation”.

Challenging the orders passed by the lower court for registration of FIR against him, Hussain had argued that the metropolitan magistrate had not disclosed reasons for directing registration of the FIR and that investigation by the police had “completely falsified” the woman’s case.


Hussain’s counsel argued before the court that he had not moved from his residence after 9.15 pm and therefore could not have been in Chattarpur at 10.30 pm as alleged by the woman. Call detail records (CDRs) of the prosecutrix also disclosed that she had remained in Dwarka till 10.45 pm, the court was told.

The police in its report had told the lower court that allegations raised by the complainant were not found to be substantiated.

Rejecting the argument that the police reply should have been treated as a report under Section 173 (2) CrPC by the lower court, Justice Menon said that FIR was a must before that and only upon conclusion of such investigation, the police could have submitted the final report.

“Even where such a report is submitted to the magistrate, the magistrate is not bound to accept that report and can still determine the question whether or not to take cognisance and proceed with the matter,” said the court.

Reacting to the High Court order, RJD national spokesperson Subodh Mehta said: “Truth should prevail. If truth is against Syed Shahnawaz Hussain, he should face the consequences. Let there be a thorough investigation in the matter.”


JD(U) spokesperson Neeraj Kumar said: “It is a judicial process. It is not fair to comment on a legal matter.”

In June 2018, the woman had approached the trial court accusing Hussain of rape. She had alleged that in April he called her to a farmhouse and raped her after lacing her cold drink with a sedative.

(With inputs from ENS, Patna)

First published on: 18-08-2022 at 09:48:56 am
Next Story

Rajasthan: Rape accused who attempted self-immolation outside police station dies

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments