Premium

Explained: The Delhi Excise Policy corruption case, the key players, and what the CBI accused them of

Arvind Kejriwal was the ‘key conspirator’, said the CBI. What was the so-called ‘scam’, and what were the allegations that have now been rejected? What is the connection between this alleged liquor money and AAP’s election campaign that the CBI alleged?

Explained: The Delhi Excise Policy corruption case, the key players, and what the CBI accused them ofAAP national convener Arvind Kejriwal and former Delhi deputy chief minister Manish Sisodia address the media at Rouse Avenue Court, in New Delhi. (PTI Photo)

Noting that there “was no overarching conspiracy or criminal intent in the excise policy,” a Delhi court on Friday (February 27) discharged Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) leaders Arvind Kejriwal, Manish Sisodia, and 21 others in the corruption case linked to the alleged excise policy “scam”.

The case arose out of a report submitted by Delhi Chief Secretary Naresh Kumar to Lieutenant Governor (LG) Vinai Kumar Saxena in July 2022, pointing to alleged procedural lapses in the formulation of the Delhi Excise Policy 2021-22.

The policy came into force in November 2021, but was scrapped in July 2022.

What was the case?

The report submitted to LG Saxena alleged that “arbitrary and unilateral decisions” taken by Sisodia in his capacity as Excise Minister in the AAP government had resulted in “financial losses to the exchequer” estimated at more than Rs 580 crore.

The report alleged that “kickbacks…received by the AAP Delhi government and AAP leaders” from owners and operators of alcohol businesses for preferential treatment such as discounts and extensions in licence fee, waiver on penalties and relief due to disruptions caused by the Covid-19 pandemic, etc. were used to “influence” the Assembly elections held in Punjab and Goa in early 2022.

The report was referred to the CBI, which opened an investigation and arrested Sisodia.

The agency claimed that Rs 100 crore in “advance kickbacks” was paid to AAP leaders by a Hyderabad-based entity described as the “South Group”. This money, the agency alleged, was used by the party to fund its 2022 Assembly election campaigns in Goa and Punjab.

Story continues below this ad

Who were the accused?

* Arvind Kejriwal, former Delhi CM, was named as a “key conspirator” by the CBI. He was accused of being involved in the formulation of the policy and the use of proceeds of crime.

* Manish Sisodia, the then Excise Minister was accused of taking “arbitrary and unilateral decisions” to benefit private liquor players.

* K. Kavitha, BRS leader, former MP, and daughter of former Telangana CM K Chandrashekar Rao was alleged to be a key member of the “South Group”, who had allegedly orchestrated the Rs 100 crore payment.

* Durgesh Pathak, AAP’s Goa election in-charge was accused of managing the funds allegedly diverted for the campaign.

Story continues below this ad

* Vijay Nair, former AAP communications in-charge, was allegedly the middleman who brokered the deal between the “South Group” and the AAP government.

* Abhishek Boinpally, Arun Ramchandra Pillai, and Butchibabu Gorantla allegedly represented the interests of the so-called “South Group”. Boinpally and Pillai were accused of facilitating the movement of the alleged kickback money.

* Sameer Mahendru, owner of Indospirits Group, was allegedly a major beneficiary of the “cartelisation” charges.

* Amandeep Singh Dhall, the owner of Brindco Spirits, was accused of being involved in the formulation of the policy to suit big distributors.

Story continues below this ad

* P. Sarath Chandra Reddy, the director of Aurobindo Pharma, was accused of controlling retail zones through proxy entities. He later turned an approver in the case and the agency heavily relied on his statements.

* Amit Arora, Director of Buddy Retail, was accused of being a middleman for kickbacks.

* Kuldeep Singh and Narender Singh were former Excise Department officials accused of overlooking procedural violations.

* Rajesh Joshi, Arvind Kumar Singh, Chanpreet Singh Rayat, and Vinod Chauhan were accused of handling the physical movement of cash or managing logistics for the election funding.

Story continues below this ad

* Mootha Goutam, Arjun Pandey, Damodar Prasad Sharma, Prince Kumar and Ashish Chand Mathur had primarily been named for their associations with the main accused and for providing “fronts” for financial transactions.

Nirbhay Thakur is a Senior Correspondent with The Indian Express who primarily covers district courts in Delhi and has reported on the trials of many high-profile cases since 2023. Professional Background Education: Nirbhay is an economics graduate from Delhi University. Beats: His reporting spans the trial courts, and he occasionally interviews ambassadors and has a keen interest in doing data stories. Specializations: He has a specific interest in data stories related to courts. Core Strength: Nirbhay is known for tracking long-running legal sagas and providing meticulous updates on high-profile criminal trials. Recent notable articles In 2025, he has written long form articles and two investigations. Along with breaking many court stories, he has also done various exclusive stories. 1) A long form on Surender Koli, accused in the Nithari serial killings of 2006. He was acquitted after spending 2 decades in jail. was a branded man. Deemed the “cannibal" who allegedly lured children to his employer’s house in Noida, murdered them, and “ate their flesh” – his actions cited were cited as evidence of human depravity at its worst. However, the SC acquitted him finding various lapses in the investigation. The Indian Express spoke to his lawyers and traced the 2 decades journey.  2) For decades, the Jawaharlal Nehru University (JNU) has been at the forefront of the Government’s national rankings, placed at No. 2 over the past two years alone. It has also been the crucible of campus activism, its protests often spilling into national debates, its student leaders going on to become the faces and voices of political parties of all hues and thoughts. The Indian Express looked at all court cases spanning over two decades and did an investigation. 3) Investigation on the 700 Delhi riots cases. The Indian Express found that in 17 of 93 acquittals (which amounted to 85% of the decided cases) in Delhi riots cases, courts red-flag ‘fabricated’ evidence and pulled up the police. Signature Style Nirbhay’s writing is characterized by its procedural depth. He excels at summarizing 400-page chargesheets and complex court orders into digestible news for the general public. X (Twitter): @Nirbhaya99 ... Read More

Stay updated with the latest - Click here to follow us on Instagram

Advertisement
Loading Recommendations...
Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments