scorecardresearch
Follow Us:
Friday, September 24, 2021

Delhi: Both Hindu, Muslim accused in riots case, court separates trial

On February 24, Salman had left his home with his uncle, and was caught in the riots at Shiv Vihar while returning. He was shot in the head and died three days later.

Written by Anand Mohan J | New Delhi |
Updated: September 15, 2021 8:11:02 am
Additional Sessions Judge Vinod Yadav passed this order in a case where five people are accused — three Hindus and two Muslims.

Relying on a Gujarat High Court judgment on the separation of trial of accused persons from two different communities during the Godhra trial, a Delhi court has ordered the separation of trial of the accused on grounds of their faith in the murder of a 24-year-old man during last year’s Northeast Delhi riots.

On February 24, Salman had left his home with his uncle, and was caught in the riots at Shiv Vihar while returning. He was shot in the head and died three days later.

Additional Sessions Judge Vinod Yadav passed this order in a case where five people are accused — three Hindus and two Muslims.

The court said that a “peculiar situation has arisen that whether the trial can be permitted to proceed with assortment of accused persons from different religions purportedly acting under two different conspiracies and unlawful assemblies.”

“This is definitely going to prejudice the defence of accused persons from different religions,” the court said.

ASJ Yadav said that a “similar situation had arisen before a Gujarat court conducting the trial of Godhra communal riots”.

The court relied on a Gujarat High Court judgment titled Additional Sessions Judge V State of Gujarat 2011, which authorised separation of trial of the accused from two different communities.

“Bearing in mind the aforesaid judicial precedent, this court also deems it appropriate to separate the trial of the accused persons so that their defence may not even likely to get prejudiced,” the court said. The court directed DCP (Crime Branch) Dr Joy N Tirkey to furnish a complete set of chargesheet in physical form to the court within two weeks.

The court directed the Ahlmad (court official) to put up a separate Sessions Case number in this FIR and the “existing chargesheet shall be treated as chargesheet for three accused persons namely, Kuldeep, Deepak Thakur and Deepak Yadav, whereas the other chargesheet shall be treated as chargesheet for accused persons Mohd Furkan and Mohd Irshad”.

As per court documents, Furkan and Irshad were captured in CCTV at the scene of crime on the date of incident. The police have cited witness statements and their phone records to place them at the spot. Their lawyers, AA Khan and Abdul Gaffar, argued they were falsely implicated. The remaining accused were also caught in CCTV footage. Kuldeep, however, was arrested in another murder case and later booked in the present case. Their lawyers argued that witnesses were planted in this case.

📣 The Indian Express is now on Telegram. Click here to join our channel (@indianexpress) and stay updated with the latest headlines

For all the latest Delhi News, download Indian Express App.

  • The Indian Express website has been rated GREEN for its credibility and trustworthiness by Newsguard, a global service that rates news sources for their journalistic standards.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
X