Premium
This is an archive article published on November 27, 2024

Awarded Rs 30,000, acid attack survivor fought for due relief; Delhi HC rules in her favour

In a recent order, The HC has held that Rs 3 lakh is the minimum amount to be paid to acid attack victims with less than 50% injuries, under the Delhi Victim Compensation Scheme, while revising the Rs 30,000 interim compensation paid by the Criminal Injuries Compensation Board.

acid attack survivor, delhi acid attack survivor, delhi high court, delhi news, India news, Indian express, current affairsThe 66-year-old told The Indian Express that the HC’s award of compensation will “help in my treatment”. She was diagnosed with brain tuberculosis

In July 2017, a gynaecologist from Delhi agreed to sell her property to a party. But the sale fell through, leading to disputes between the two by December. A year later, in February, the erstwhile buyer allegedly barged into the woman’s house in Delhi’s Naraina, assaulted her and threw acid. Trying to escape, she ran to the bathroom and locked herself in — the acid, however, had fallen on her clothes, burning her legs and feet.

In 2018, she filed a representation seeking Rs 3 lakh as compensation. In 2019, a Criminal Injuries Compensation Board constituted by the Delhi State Legal Services Authority (DSLSA) awarded her interim compensation of just Rs 30,000. Its reasoning? Her injuries have mostly healed, and she suffered 5-8% acid burns, and authorities have the discretion to award less than the minimum amount of compensation. In the meantime, the woman petitioned the Delhi High Court.

Six years since the incident, and five years since she challenged the DSLSA’s order, the HC has ruled in her favour.

The HC has held that Rs 3 lakh is the minimum amount to be paid to acid attack victims with less than 50% injuries, under the Delhi Victim Compensation Scheme, while revising the Rs 30,000 interim compensation paid by the Criminal Injuries Compensation Board.

Now bed-ridden at her residence in Naraina after being diagnosed with brain tuberculosis eight months ago, the 66-year-old told The Indian Express over a phone call that the HC’s award of compensation will “at least help in my treatment”.

“It took so long that I filed a case after the authorities did not hear my grievance. Now I’m bedridden. The advocate I had engaged initially would not appear before the court and the case would not move. Then I engaged another lawyer… and after my brain tuberculosis diagnosis, I requested them to pursue the case so my treatment could go on uninterrupted. The compensation award will be of significant help as I’ve no income source,” said the woman, who used to run a private clinic before retiring.

An FIR was registered following the incident and according to the petitioner, the criminal case continues to be before a trial court without a verdict.

What happened over the years

Story continues below this ad

In October 2018, the woman sent a representation to the Southwest Delhi district magistrate seeking disbursement of interim compensation as per the Delhi Victim Compensation Scheme, 2015, to the tune of Rs 3 lakh. With no response or action, she approached the HC.

While the petition was pending, the DSLSA constituted a Criminal Injuries Compensation Board — comprising the district magistrate, district and sessions judge, assistant commissioner of police, chief district medical officer, and medical professionals among other officials. Ultimately on July 15, 2019, the DSLSA decided to award her Rs 30,000 as interim compensation.

Challenging this before the HC, the woman, through her advocate Sanjana Srikumar, submitted that the DSLSA does not have the authority to award compensation less than the mandatory minimum in the scheme, and the only discretion available to the authorities is on awarding an amount between Rs 3 lakh and 5 lakh.

What the court said

In an order on November 6, Justice Tara Vitasta Ganju ruled that none of the clauses of the compensation scheme suggest DSLSA “has any discretion to determine the scale of quantum of compensation in acid attack cases” and “the only discretion that is culled out is declining the compensation altogether”.

Story continues below this ad

Accepting the petitioner’s contention, the court noted the scheme provides that a minimum compensation of Rs 3 lakh be paid to victims of an acid attack where there is less than 50% injury. “It has been averred that acid attack victims cannot be treated the same as victims of other injuries. We find merit in this contention upon an examination of judgments cited and the Scheme and its Schedule…,” the order records.

“The Schedule to the Scheme sets out that for acid attack victims, where injuries are less than 50%, a minimum of Rs 3 lakh is payable and a maximum of Rs 5 lakh. This means that Respondent No.4 (DSLSA) is at liberty to exercise its discretion to examine what amount is to be paid — provided the amount is between Rs 3 lakh and Rs 5 lakh. This Court finds that such an interpretation would be the correct interpretation of the legislative intent of the Scheme, especially since it sets out a separate quantification for different types of acid attacks… Once a decision has been made to award compensation, it cannot be arbitrarily reduced below the minimum threshold as has been provided for,” the court reasoned.

 

Sohini Ghosh is a Senior Correspondent at The Indian Express. Previously based in Ahmedabad covering Gujarat, she recently moved to the New Delhi bureau, where she primarily covers legal developments at the Delhi High Court Professional Profile Background: An alumna of the Asian College of Journalism (ACJ), she previously worked with ET NOW before joining The Indian Express. Core Beats: Her reporting is currently centered on the Delhi High Court, with a focus on high-profile constitutional disputes, disputes over intellectual property, criminal and civil cases, issues of human rights and regulatory law (especially in the areas of technology and healthcare). Earlier Specialty: In Gujarat, she was known for her rigorous coverage in the beats of crime, law and policy, and social justice issues, including the 2002 riot cases, 2008 serial bomb blast case, 2016 flogging of Dalits in Una, among others. She has extensively covered health in the state, including being part of the team that revealed the segregation of wards at the state’s largest government hospital on lines of faith in April 2020. With Ahmedabad being a UNESCO heritage city, she has widely covered urban development and heritage issues, including the redevelopment of the Sabarmati Ashram Recent Notable Articles (Late 2025) Her recent reporting from the Delhi High Court covers major political, constitutional, corporate, and public-interest legal battles: High-Profile Case Coverage She has extensively covered the various legal battles - including for compensation under the aegis of North East Delhi Riots Claims Commission - pertaining to the 2020 northeast Delhi riots, as well as 1984 anti-Sikh riots. She has also led coverage at the intersection of technology and governance, and its impact on the citizenry, from, and beyond courtrooms — such as the government’s stakeholder consultations for framing AI-Deepfake policy. Signature Style Sohini is recognized for her sustained reporting from courtrooms and beyond. She specialises in breaking down dense legal arguments to make legalese accessible for readers. Her transition from Gujarat to Delhi has seen her expand her coverage on regulatory, corporate and intellectual property law, while maintaining a strong commitment to human rights and lacuna in the criminal justice system. X (Twitter): @thanda_ghosh ... Read More

Stay updated with the latest - Click here to follow us on Instagram

Advertisement
Loading Recommendations...
Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments