Afzal Pathan, the modernist painter from Madhya Pradesh whom India forgot

“When I was in Indore last year, I happened to see some of Pathan’s works at an exhibition. I was so impressed. But somehow he has not been part of the larger scene of Indian modern art. I thought that this was an artist who needed to be brought to notice and attention,” poet, literary critic, and editor Ashok Vajpeyi said.

Vajpeyi is Managing and Life Trustee of The Raza Foundation, an arts and culture non-profit established in 2001 by the modern Indian master S H Raza, which has organised the exhibition.

Pathan, who belonged to Dewas in Madhya Pradesh, completed his Masters in drawing and painting in Indore in 1968. “He almost anonymously started a new trend in Madhya Pradesh. At a time when neo-narrative art, figurative art, landscapes or portraits were the usual practice, he was making abstract art,” Vajpeyi said.

The exhibition features more than 40 of Pathan’s works. Artist Akhilesh, who has curated the show, said Pathan started making abstract works in the 1970s, and  developed a unique technique of sweeping strokes with cloth or hand, which gave his art a continuity even when bound by a frame.

“He only picked up the brush for the small details,” Akhilesh said.

Pathan was a prolific painter, and Akhilesh said his repertoire of more than 5,000 works now remain in the care of his family in Dewas. “He wasn’t like other artists who would spend hours or days on a single work. He would finish a painting in half an hour,” said Akhilesh who, like Pathan, went to the Indore School of Art.

The works at the exhibition, all untitled and belonging to the last decade of Pathan’s life, carry a restraint that suggests a deeply thoughtful and reflective mind. They are replete with rural quotidian forms – a bird, a home, windows, a moth.

“His works are mature, well-designed, well-painted, and structurally very strong – and yet, they invite you to see as many meanings in them as you like,” Vajpeyi said.

In his early portraits and landscapes, Pathan often used impasto, a technique favoured by the French expressionists, in which paint is applied thickly enough to make brushstrokes or palette knife marks clearly visible. The catalogue essay by art critic Soumitra Das, one of the few pieces of documented literature on Pathan, notes that artists Ram Kumar and J Swaminathan had praised his work at one of his early exhibitions in Madhya Pradesh.

Why then did Pathan fail to rise to the heights of popularity that many of his peers from the Malwa plateau region, including Husain, Raza, and N S Bendre, did? It was in part because Pathan’s circumstances forced anonymity on him, Akhilesh said – but probably also because he made no effort to become famous.

“He was born into a humble household, and for a large part of his working life he took care of his three siblings on his meagre salary of an art teacher. He was so bogged down by responsibilities that he did not have much time to think about exhibitions – or perhaps he did not have money to spare to travel for shows or even get his works framed,” Akhilesh said.

“But”, he added, “Pathan was also never really chasing fame or money. Art for him was a moment of relief after a long day.”

Both the government and the people have a responsibility to not allow art and artists to fade away, Vajpeyi said. “Part of the problem arises from the collapse of the state-supported infrastructure for the arts. Ultimately it is society which should care for its artists,” he said.