scorecardresearch
Sunday, Oct 02, 2022

Madras HC stays I-T department order imposing fine on actor Vijay

During the searches, the I-T order had said Vijay had acknowledged receiving Rs 5 crore in cash and Rs 16 crore in cheque payments for his work in the Tamil film ‘Puli’.

During the searches, the I-T order had said Vijay had acknowledged receiving Rs 5 crore in cash and Rs 16 crore in cheque payments for his work in the Tamil film ‘Puli’. (File photo)

The Madras high court Tuesday ordered an interim stay on an Income Tax department order that imposed a fine on Tamil actor Vijay for his “admittedly undisclosed earnings of Rs 15 crore in financial year 2015-16”. The fine, Rs 1.5 crore, was imposed after searches were conducted at his premises in September 2015.

During the searches, the I-T order had said Vijay had acknowledged receiving Rs 5 crore in cash and Rs 16 crore in cheque payments for his work in the Tamil film ‘Puli’. He reportedly admitted receiving an additional Rs 10 crore in cash during the same financial year, although it was not disclosed in his I-T return submitted to the department. The I-T department said Vijay reportedly agreed to pay the tax amount for Rs 15 crore of undisclosed income.

Subsequently, the department passed an order imposing “a fine — a 10% penalty on the undisclosed income based on his admission-citing that the crime was only discovered through searches, not through a voluntary submission”.

Vijay later moved a plea in the Madras high court in which he claimed that the penalty order was invalid because it was issued after the limitation period for initiating such action had expired.

Subscriber Only Stories
From The Explained editor: The ban on PFI, forests at night, and free gra...Premium
From the Opinion Editor: An election for the Congress partyPremium
From Nehru to JP, the political leaders mentored by GandhiPremium
Uttarakhand resort murder: Amid questions within, BJP may revamp Dhami go...Premium

Justice Anita Sumanth accepted the actor’s appeal of the order from June 30. The court asked the department to submit a response by September 16.

First published on: 16-08-2022 at 02:48:20 pm
Next Story

SC to consider plea for mediation to settle disputes between SpiceJet & Kalanithi Maran

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement