Premium

Punjab and Haryana High Court raps Haryana for ‘unfair labour practice’, orders regularisation of long-term daily wagers

Punjab and Haryana High Court says Haryana govt was “shrugging off its responsibility” after using petitioners’ labour for over 25 years, directs regularisation under 1996 policy with arrears, interest, and retirement dues.

Punjab and Haryana High Court raps Haryana for ‘unfair labour practice’, orders regularisation of long-term daily wagersPunjab and Haryana High Court seeks Haryana reply in four weeks on plea against appointment of retired DGP as police complaints body chairperson. (file)

The Punjab and Haryana High Court on Wednesday came down sharply on the Haryana Government for denying regularisation and retirement benefits to daily wage workers who served for decades in the Forest Department. Justice Sandeep Moudgil of the High Court held that the state’s conduct amounts to “unfair labour practice” and is “wholly insensitive and unbecoming of a welfare State”.

The court ruled that the petitioners, led by Phoolwati — a Group-D daily wage labourer who joined service in 1988, are entitled to regularisation despite the state’s objections based on the Uma Devi judgment. Phoolwati was verbally terminated on December 26, 2016.

Deciding a batch of 18 connected writ petitions, Justice Moudgil allowed the petitions on December 31, set aside the state’s speaking order dated October 1, 2024, and directed that the petitioners be regularised under the 1996 regularisation policy “from the due date” with all consequential benefits. These include retirement dues and arrears with 6 per cent interest.

The judge clarified that “this judgment shall govern all the connected matters claiming regularisation under the 1996 policy with similar facts”, extending relief to all similarly placed daily wagers whose cases were heard together.

Petitioners denied retirement benefits

Phoolwati was engaged as a mali/labourer on daily wages on June 10, 1988, in the Saraswati Forest Range, Kaithal, and continued on the muster roll without a formal appointment letter. The court recorded that “her work remained satisfactory throughout and no adverse record was ever reported”.

Despite state policies issued in 1996 and 2003, and a clarificatory notification in 2014 for regularisation of eligible Group-C and Group-D daily wagers, their services were never regularised, even though they fulfilled the eligibility conditions under the 1996 policy and “several similarly situated and junior employees were granted regularization”.

Phoolwati’s termination was later set aside by the Labour Court, Ambala, which ordered reinstatement with continuity of service and 50 per cent back wages. The award was upheld by the High Court, with back wages reduced to 30 per cent.

Story continues below this ad

On the first issue, the court held that the Labour Court’s award granting reinstatement with continuity of service gives the petitioners a legally enforceable right to be treated as in uninterrupted service from 1988 for all service-related benefits, including regularisation.

The court described unlawful termination as “nothing short of an unjust expropriation of the workman’s right to labour and his rightful livelihood”. It stated that when such action is undone, “the law intervenes not merely to correct the wrong, but to restore the equilibrium which the employer’s unlawful act has disturbed”.

The court rejected the state’s attempt to retrospectively portray the work as seasonal, terming it “a direct challenge to judicial finality”, and held that the petitioner must be treated as having continued in uninterrupted service from 1988.

Turning to the 1996 policy, the court noted that following the March 18, 1996 amendment, daily-rated Group-D employees with three years of service as of January 31, 1996, who had worked at least 240 days in each year with no break exceeding one month, “shall be regularised”. Justice Moudgil held that all these conditions were fully satisfied in the present case.

Story continues below this ad

‘Benefit becomes a vested entitlement’

Invoking the doctrine of accrued or crystallised rights, the court held that once an employee fulfils all conditions of a policy while it is in force, “the benefit is no longer contingent but becomes a vested entitlement which cannot be retrospectively defeated by subsequent administrative withdrawal”.

On the issue of discrimination, the court held that the denial of regularisation to the petitioners, when several employees performing identical duties under the same policy framework and even junior to them had been regularised, violates Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution.

Contention that petitioners were “back-door entrants” rejected

Invoking the Model Employer Doctrine, the court rejected the state’s contention that the petitioners were “back-door entrants” not recruited through advertisement.

“The length of service in the instant case is good enough and a strong reason weighing with this court to hold that there is a regular need of work and her services are required, but the state government is probably shrugging off its responsibility,” Justice Moudgil observed.

Story continues below this ad

The court further directed that arrears of pay and delayed retiral dues shall carry interest at 6 per cent per annum from the date they became due until actual realisation. The state has been ordered to complete the exercise within four weeks so that “the petitioner is not further made to suffer for no fault of her own”. By holding that the judgment will govern all connected matters involving similar facts, the ruling will regularise all 18 petitioners in the batch and is likely to have wider implications for long-serving Group-D workers in Haryana’s Forest Department and beyond.

Manraj Grewal Sharma is a senior journalist and the Resident Editor of The Indian Express in Chandigarh, where she leads the newspaper’s coverage of north India’s most politically and institutionally significant regions. From Punjab and Haryana to Himachal Pradesh and the Union Territory of Chandigarh, she oversees reporting at the intersection of governance, law, politics and society. She also reports on the diaspora, especially in Canada and the US. With a career spanning journalism across several countries, academia and international development, Manraj brings a rare depth of perspective to regional reporting. She is widely regarded as a leading chronicler of Punjab’s contemporary history and socio-political evolution, particularly its long shadow of militancy, federal tensions and identity politics. Her book, Dreams after Darkness, remains a definitive account of the militancy years and their enduring aftermath. Professional Background & Expertise A gold medalist in mass communication and a post-graduate in English literature, Manraj has a multifaceted career spanning journalism, academia, and international development. She was also awarded a fellowship by National Foundation of India and did several in-depth pieces on Manipur. Internationally, she has reported from Israel, US, UK, Myanmar, and Mauritius Her key focus areas include: Regional Politics, History, Agriculture, Diaspora, and Security. Of late, she has started focusing on Legal & Judicial Affairs: Much of her recent work involves reporting on high-stakes cases in the Punjab and Haryana High Court, ranging from environmental policy to civil rights. International Consulting: She previously served as a consulting editor for the Asia Pacific Adaptation Network and a publishing consultant for the Asian Development Bank (ADB) in Manila. Academia: For five years, she was the managing editor of Gender, Technology and Development, a peer-reviewed international journal at the Asian Institute of Technology, Bangkok. Recent Notable Articles (Late 2025) Her recent reportage focuses heavily on judicial interventions and regional governance: 1. Environment & Governance "‘NGT can’t test legality of policy’: HC hears challenge to Punjab’s ‘Green Habitat’ plan" (Dec 22, 2025): Covering a critical legal battle over whether the National Green Tribunal has the authority to strike down a state policy regularizing farmhouses on delisted forest land. "High court pulls up Punjab poll panel over audio clip probe" (Dec 10, 2025): Reporting on judicial concerns regarding the transparency and fairness of local body elections. 2. Legal Rights & Social Welfare "HC issues notice to Punjab, Haryana over delay in building old age homes" (Dec 22, 2025): Reporting on a contempt petition against top officials for failing to establish government-run homes for the elderly as promised in 2019. "Victims can appeal acquittals in sessions court without seeking special leave" (Dec 19, 2025): Highlighting a significant procedural shift in criminal law following a Supreme Court ruling. "HC upholds benefits for Punjab FCI officer acquitted in 20-year-old bribery case" (Dec 19, 2025): A report on the concept of "honourable acquittal" and its impact on employee benefits. 3. Human Rights & Identity "As Punjab denies parole to MP Amritpal Singh, HC asks it to submit ‘foundational material’" (Dec 1, 2025): Covering the legal proceedings regarding the radical preacher and sitting MP's request to attend Parliament. "Protecting life paramount: HC backs Muslim woman in live-in after verbal divorce" (Nov 6, 2025): Analyzing judicial protections for personal liberty in the context of traditional practices. Signature Beats Manraj is recognized for her ability to decode complex judicial rulings and relate them to the everyday lives of citizens. Whether it is a 30-year-old land battle in Fazilka or the political implications of Kangana Ranaut’s candidacy in Mandi, her writing provides deep historical and regional context. Contact @grewal_sharma on X manrajgrewalsharma on Instagram ... Read More

Stay updated with the latest - Click here to follow us on Instagram

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments
Advertisement
Loading Taboola...
Advertisement