5 min readChandigarhJun 24, 2026 01:44 PM IST
First published on: Jun 24, 2026 at 01:44 PM IST
At the heart of the controversy surrounding Chandigarh’s proposed Master Plan amendments lies a striking contradiction in the expert committee report itself. While recommending a substantial increase in the floor area ratio (FAR) for the industrial belt, ground coverage and building heights in industrial areas, a panel of UT officers simultaneously acknowledged that existing infrastructure would require major augmentation before the changes could be implemented, details accessed by The Indian Express suggested.
Documents showed that the committee, headed by the Deputy Commissioner-cum-Estate Officer and comprising officials from the Municipal Corporation, Engineering Department, Urban Planning Department, Chandigarh Housing Board and other government departments, recommended relaxations in building norms for industrial and commercial areas. The committee was tasked by the Administrator with examining measures to reduce what it termed “land loss” and increase development potential.
The bureaucratic panel itself clearly specified that the “recommendation shall be kept in abeyance till infrastructure augmentation of the components as mentioned above is not executed”.
The expert committee report, a copy of which is with The Indian Express, revived an issue flagged in Chandigarh Master Plan 2031, which had cautioned against increasing FAR because of pressure on existing infrastructure.
“In view of the enhanced FAR… the Engineering Department, UT Chandigarh and Chandigarh Municipal Corporation shall undertake augmentation of the existing trunk infrastructure of Industrial Area Phase I and II to commensurate with the increased development load,” the report said.
It further specifies that the augmentation must cover “sewer pipelines, water pipelines, electricity network, effluent treatment plants, waste collection systems, road width and public parking”.
However, the committee proceeded to recommend denser development, while simultaneously acknowledging that extensive upgrades would be required before it could absorb the additional load. It cited representations by several industrial associations for seconding the recommendations.
The committee, constituted under the administration’s Deregulation 1.0 exercise, recommended increasing FAR in Industrial Area Phases I and II to 2.0, raising ground coverage to 60 per cent for all plots and allowing building heights of up to 68 feet and 3 inches for plots up to two kanals. The objective, according to the report, was to reduce land loss, maximise the potential of industrial plots, and bring Chandigarh at par with its neighbouring states.
One of the most significant recommendations related to industrial plots up to two kanals. At present, these plots are governed by Chandigarh’s architectural controls, which regulate the design and form of construction. The committee recommended allowing plot owners to abandon architectural controls and shift permanently to a zoning framework if they wish to avail a higher FAR. Once exercised, the option would be irreversible.
The recommendation effectively opened the door to more intensive development and taller structures in areas that were historically governed by Chandigarh’s uniform architectural character.
Recognises Chandigarh’s inadequate infrastructure
Notably, the report itself acknowledged concerns over inadequate infrastructure. While citing Chandigarh Master Plan 2031, the committee records that industrial associations had long demanded higher FAR and relaxation of building controls. However, the Master Plan had earlier stated that no further increase in FAR should be allowed because of pressure on already inadequate infrastructure. Despite this, the committee recommended enhanced FAR, arguing that it would bring Chandigarh on par with neighbouring states such as Punjab and Haryana.
However, after recommending the relaxations, the committee went on to record that the enhanced FAR would significantly increase development load and require strengthening of civic infrastructure.
The committee directed that the recommendations should not be implemented until the infrastructure upgrades are actually carried out.
“It is again clarified that the recommendation shall be kept in abeyance till infrastructure augmentation of the components as mentioned above is not executed, the report said.
Resident welfare associations, urban planners and former officials have argued that Chandigarh’s roads, parking facilities, water supply systems and civic infrastructure are already under pressure.
Meanwhile, Chandigarh Chamber of Industries said that infrastructure cannot be an “afterthought” and that the UT Administration has the capacity and resources to support planned growth.
“As the industry expands, infrastructure must grow with it. The new FAR policy can boost the economy, but it should be rolled out along with upgrades to roads, utilities and parking. Infrastructure strengthening cannot be an afterthought. A balanced approach is essential to protect both businesses and residents and ensure Chandigarh’s development remains organised and sustainable,” Naveen Manglani, vice president, Chamber of Chandigarh Industries, said.
Activist R K Garg has opposed the FAR increase, stressing that Chandigarh is already saturated and congested.
“The city is already saturated with all sorts of congestion, and which will be further pressurised with no window to get out of it. The FAR increase from 1.5 to 2 on payment basis is a failure for the city,” Garg added.
The bureaucratic panel itself clearly specified that the “recommendation shall be kept in abeyance till infrastructure augmentation of the components as mentioned above is not executed”. (Source: File) 
Share
