Premium

HC quashes her plea, Kangana to face defamation trial in Bathinda

Court notes lack of any apology from actor-MP who had retweeted a post wrongly identifying farm law protester Mahinder Kaur as Bilkis Bano of Shaheen Bagh fame

4 min readChandigarhUpdated: Aug 1, 2025 10:35 PM IST

The case is based on complaint against Kangana Ranaut filed by Mahinder Kaur (73) of Bahadurgarh Jandian village in Punjab's Bathinda district in 2021. (PTI Photo)

The Punjab and Haryana High Court Friday dismissed a petition filed by actor and BJP MP Kangana Ranaut seeking quashing of summons issued to her by a court in Bathinda in a defamation complaint. Ranaut will now stand trial in the defamation case before the Judicial Magistrate in Bathinda.

The case is based on complaint against Kangana filed by Mahinder Kaur (73) of Bahadurgarh Jandian village in Punjab’s Bathinda district in 2021. Mahinder Kaur, who had been protesting against the now repealed three farm laws, had alleged that the actor defamed her in a retweet she shared on the Twitter (now X) by identifying her wrongly as Bilkis Bano of Shaheen Bagh fame.

Quashing the petition, Justice Tribhuvan Dahiya said that there are specific allegations against Ranaut that “false and defamatory imputations by her in the retweet have dented the respondent’s reputation and lowered her in her own estimation, as also in the eyes of others”.

The bench specifically noted the absence of any apology from Ranaut. “It is evident from the evidence led by the complainant that the accused made the impugned defamatory remarks without going into the truthfulness thereof and furthermore, she even failed to tender any apology to the complainant after knowing the truth,” the court held.

Kaur had filed criminal complaint before the Judicial Magistrate First Class in Bathinda on January 5, 2021 under Sections 499 and 500 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), which deal with defamation and its punishment, respectively. The controversy centers on a retweet by Ranaut of a post originally made by Advocate Gautam Yadav, which included a picture of Kaur accompanied by the remark, “is available in 100 rupees.” Ranaut shared the tweet alleging that the ‘Shaheen Bagh dadi’ also joined the farmers’ agitation at various border points of the national capital. The retweet, which reached Ranaut’s millions of followers, was deemed defamatory by Kaur, who argued it tarnished her reputation and character.

Following the recording of preliminary evidence, the Magistrate issued a summoning order on February 22, 2022, directing Ranaut to face trial for the alleged offense. Ranaut filed a plea before the high court, under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, seeking quashing of complaint and also the summoning order issued by the lower court, arguing procedural irregularities and lack of intent to defame.

Dismissing Ranaut’s plea, Justice Dahiya held that the summoning order was “well-reasoned” and based on sufficient prima facie evidence establishing the ingredients of defamation under Sections 499 and 500 IPC.

Story continues below this ad

The court found that the retweet, which contained “serious allegations against the person and character of the complainant,” met these criteria. It further noted that Ranaut, as a public figure with a substantial social media following, had “extra responsibility on her shoulders to verify the truthfulness of the remarks made by her.”

The judgment highlighted that Ranaut “failed to tender any apology to the complainant after knowing the truth,” reinforcing the Magistrate’s decision to proceed with the case.

The judge also dismissed the argument that the Director of TCIPL (Twitter Communications India Private Limited) had not sent a report sought by the Magistrate. The court clarified that since the Magistrate had conducted an inquiry and was satisfied with the preliminary evidence, the absence of the TCIPL report did not invalidate the summoning order.

The court also rejected the contention by Ranaut that the retweet was made in “good faith”.

Story continues below this ad

Ranaut’s counsel also argued that the Magistrate’s reference to the retweet as a “tweet” indicated a lack of application of mind. The court dismissed this as a minor error, stating, “Merely because the Magistrate wrongly mentioned the petitioner’s retweet as tweet in the impugned order, it cannot be said that the order is unsustainable.”

Finally, Ranaut’s counsel pointed out that the complaint was filed only against her and not against Advocate Yadav, whose original tweet was retweeted. The court found this argument irrelevant, noting that the complainant’s decision to pursue Ranaut did not negate the prima facie evidence of defamation.

Manraj Grewal Sharma

Manraj Grewal Sharma is a senior journalist and the Resident Editor of The Indian Express in Chandigarh, where she leads the newspaper’s coverage of north India’s most politically and institutionally significant regions. From Punjab and Haryana to Himachal Pradesh and the Union Territory of Chandigarh, she oversees reporting at the intersection of governance, law, politics and society. She also reports on the diaspora, especially in Canada and the US. With a career spanning journalism across several countries, academia and international development, Manraj brings a rare depth of perspective to regional reporting. She is widely regarded as a leading chronicler of Punjab’s contemporary history and socio-political evolution, particularly its long shadow of militancy, federal tensions and identity politics. Her book, Dreams after Darkness, remains a definitive account of the militancy years and their enduring aftermath. Professional Background & Expertise A gold medalist in mass communication and a post-graduate in English literature, Manraj has a multifaceted career spanning journalism, academia, and international development. She was also awarded a fellowship by National Foundation of India and did several in-depth pieces on Manipur. Internationally, she has reported from Israel, US, UK, Myanmar, and Mauritius Her key focus areas include: Regional Politics, History, Agriculture, Diaspora, and Security. Of late, she has started focusing on Legal & Judicial Affairs: Much of her recent work involves reporting on high-stakes cases in the Punjab and Haryana High Court, ranging from environmental policy to civil rights. International Consulting: She previously served as a consulting editor for the Asia Pacific Adaptation Network and a publishing consultant for the Asian Development Bank (ADB) in Manila. Academia: For five years, she was the managing editor of Gender, Technology and Development, a peer-reviewed international journal at the Asian Institute of Technology, Bangkok. Recent Notable Articles (Late 2025) Her recent reportage focuses heavily on judicial interventions and regional governance: 1. Environment & Governance "‘NGT can’t test legality of policy’: HC hears challenge to Punjab’s ‘Green Habitat’ plan" (Dec 22, 2025): Covering a critical legal battle over whether the National Green Tribunal has the authority to strike down a state policy regularizing farmhouses on delisted forest land. "High court pulls up Punjab poll panel over audio clip probe" (Dec 10, 2025): Reporting on judicial concerns regarding the transparency and fairness of local body elections. 2. Legal Rights & Social Welfare "HC issues notice to Punjab, Haryana over delay in building old age homes" (Dec 22, 2025): Reporting on a contempt petition against top officials for failing to establish government-run homes for the elderly as promised in 2019. "Victims can appeal acquittals in sessions court without seeking special leave" (Dec 19, 2025): Highlighting a significant procedural shift in criminal law following a Supreme Court ruling. "HC upholds benefits for Punjab FCI officer acquitted in 20-year-old bribery case" (Dec 19, 2025): A report on the concept of "honourable acquittal" and its impact on employee benefits. 3. Human Rights & Identity "As Punjab denies parole to MP Amritpal Singh, HC asks it to submit ‘foundational material’" (Dec 1, 2025): Covering the legal proceedings regarding the radical preacher and sitting MP's request to attend Parliament. "Protecting life paramount: HC backs Muslim woman in live-in after verbal divorce" (Nov 6, 2025): Analyzing judicial protections for personal liberty in the context of traditional practices. Signature Beats Manraj is recognized for her ability to decode complex judicial rulings and relate them to the everyday lives of citizens. Whether it is a 30-year-old land battle in Fazilka or the political implications of Kangana Ranaut’s candidacy in Mandi, her writing provides deep historical and regional context. Contact @grewal_sharma on X manrajgrewalsharma on Instagram ... Read More

Stay updated with the latest - Click here to follow us on Instagram

Loading Recommendations...

Mar 07: Latest News

Live Blog