Haryana govt tells court Junaid’s kin want money and land, family deny claimhttps://indianexpress.com/article/cities/chandigarh/haryana-govt-tells-court-junaids-kin-want-money-and-land-family-deny-claim-4920188/

Haryana govt tells court Junaid’s kin want money and land, family deny claim

The trial court recently framed charges against main accused Naresh Kumar and Rameshwar Dass among others.

junaid khan murder case, junaid khan murder, junaid khan lynching, faridabad train lynching, faridabad train lynching case, beef lynching, junaid khan murderer trial, india news
Father Jalaluddin (right) has sought transfer of probe.

The Haryana government Thursday told the Punjab and Haryana High Court that the family of Junaid Khan, the 15-year-old boy who was killed by a mob on a Mathura-bound train in June, wants a “compromise” in the murder case and is seeking “two crore rupees and three acres of land” from the accused to settle the matter.

Junaid’s family, however, rejected the government’s claim, saying it was a “rumour” and an “attempt to put pressure on us”. In the High Court too, the family counsel objected to the “compromise” claim made by Additional Advocate General Deepak Sabharwal, representing the state. Observing that many arguments are made in court, Justice Rajan Gupta said “this court has not even taken (it) on note” and the case will be decided with “utmost solemnity”.

Sabharwal made the claim during arguments on a plea by Junaid’s family members who have sought a CBI probe into the attack and a stay on proceedings in the trial court in Faridabad. The family has alleged that the Haryana police diluted charges against the accused in the case.

“They (Junaid’s family) want to compromise. The security provided to them was returned, and now two gunmen have again been deputed for their safety. He (Junaid’s father) has also refused to accept summons from the police,” Sabharwal told the bench. He said he had received oral instructions in this regard from a Deputy Superintendent of Police (DSP) that the family wants to delay trial court proceedings and wants to take money to reach a compromise.

Advertising

Senior advocate R S Cheema, representing the family, objected. “These are slanderous allegations. I did not want to sensationalise the case… A man has lost his son. It (the statement) is adding insult to injury.” He said “illegal panchayats” were forcing the family to resile from their stand in courts.

Later, speaking to The Indian Express over phone, a member of Junaid’s family denied the government’s claim and said they have already taken the matter to court and will abide by its decision. “Panchayat and people from the villages of accused wanted a compromise, saying ‘bhai chara bana rahega’ (brotherhood will prevail). But we have already turned it down. The claim of seeking money is just a rumour. They want to put pressure on us,” the family member, who did not wish to be named, said.

 

Read full story here.