Premium
This is an archive article published on April 21, 2023

In 2002, 11 were murdered; today justice has been murdered, say Naroda Gam riot survivors

As the Nanavati Commission report noted, Madinaben, in a letter to the police commissioner in 2002, had stated that her husband, mother-in-law and two brothers-in-law were killed after being sprinkled with kerosene and set on fire.

In 2002, 11 were murdered; today justice has been murdered, say Naroda Gam riot survivorsOne of the accused people outside the court in Ahmedabad on Thursday. (Express photo by Nirmal Harindran)
Listen to this article
In 2002, 11 were murdered; today justice has been murdered, say Naroda Gam riot survivors
x
00:00
1x 1.5x 1.8x

With all 67 accused in the Naroda Gam case acquitted by a special court, witnesses who deposed in the trial described Thursday as a “black day” for the victims, terming it to be “devoid of conscience”.

Imtiyaz Ahmed Hussein Kureshi (50), who was a prosecution witness, said, “I had identified 17 of the accused, including Jaideep Patel (former VHP leader), Pradyuman Patel, then sitting corporators Vallabh Patel and Ashok Patel. I had seen them instigating the mob and signalling them to burn down masjid, to attack particular places. I saw them burning families to death – five were burnt to death right in front of my eyes – and I identified them. I also remembered the colour of the clothes the accused were wearing. I gave all evidence.”

“They should have been punished with a life term. Instead, this acquittal makes us lose our faith in the judiciary. It is a black day for us victims. Those who died, did they die by suicide then? Did they burn themselves to death?”

“But we will continue fighting, we will challenge this before the Gujarat High Court. It’s been 21 years but I cannot forget the details of the massacre. There was a new bride who had come to Kumbhar Vas, she had not even been married for 15 days. I saw her being stabbed with my own eyes. Her whole family was killed and she returned to her maternal place. Is all we saw a lie?” Kureshi asked.

“Despite the delay of 21 years, we still had hope from the court. We believed the court would have conscience. Even if I discount the acquittal of those accused of minor offences, we believed those charged of murder, at least some of them might be held guilty. In 2002, 11 were murdered and today justice has been murdered,” he added.

Among those who lost family members in the Naroda Gam massacre was Madinaben Arifhussain Malek — then new bride that Kureshi refers to.

As the Nanavati Commission report noted, Madinaben, in a letter to the police commissioner in 2002, had stated that her husband, mother-in-law and two brothers-in-law were killed after being sprinkled with kerosene and set on fire. Madina had also testified before the commission but not before the court.

Story continues below this ad

Sharif Malek (42), another a witness in the case, and had identified and testified against 13 of the accused in the court, including Maya Kodnani and Jaideep Patel, said: “This verdict indicates that those participating in state-sponsored violence against minorities will go scot-free. It is an indirect message to people at large. It diminishes our faith in the judiciary and in fact raises questions on the judiciary’s impropriety.”

“While disappointing, we will not be discouraged. We will fight for the next 21 years and 50 days in appeal if need be,” Malek added.

Sohini Ghosh is a Senior Correspondent at The Indian Express. Previously based in Ahmedabad covering Gujarat, she recently moved to the New Delhi bureau, where she primarily covers legal developments at the Delhi High Court Professional Profile Background: An alumna of the Asian College of Journalism (ACJ), she previously worked with ET NOW before joining The Indian Express. Core Beats: Her reporting is currently centered on the Delhi High Court, with a focus on high-profile constitutional disputes, disputes over intellectual property, criminal and civil cases, issues of human rights and regulatory law (especially in the areas of technology and healthcare). Earlier Specialty: In Gujarat, she was known for her rigorous coverage in the beats of crime, law and policy, and social justice issues, including the 2002 riot cases, 2008 serial bomb blast case, 2016 flogging of Dalits in Una, among others. She has extensively covered health in the state, including being part of the team that revealed the segregation of wards at the state’s largest government hospital on lines of faith in April 2020. With Ahmedabad being a UNESCO heritage city, she has widely covered urban development and heritage issues, including the redevelopment of the Sabarmati Ashram Recent Notable Articles (Late 2025) Her recent reporting from the Delhi High Court covers major political, constitutional, corporate, and public-interest legal battles: High-Profile Case Coverage She has extensively covered the various legal battles - including for compensation under the aegis of North East Delhi Riots Claims Commission - pertaining to the 2020 northeast Delhi riots, as well as 1984 anti-Sikh riots. She has also led coverage at the intersection of technology and governance, and its impact on the citizenry, from, and beyond courtrooms — such as the government’s stakeholder consultations for framing AI-Deepfake policy. Signature Style Sohini is recognized for her sustained reporting from courtrooms and beyond. She specialises in breaking down dense legal arguments to make legalese accessible for readers. Her transition from Gujarat to Delhi has seen her expand her coverage on regulatory, corporate and intellectual property law, while maintaining a strong commitment to human rights and lacuna in the criminal justice system. X (Twitter): @thanda_ghosh ... Read More

Stay updated with the latest - Click here to follow us on Instagram

Advertisement
Loading Recommendations...
Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments