Updated: October 30, 2021 8:07:40 pm
The Gujarat High Court, in an order dated October 26, quashed and set aside a 2017 FIR against Congress MLA from Patan Kirit Patel, accusing him and two others of sexual harassment, criminal intimidation, criminal defamation.
The complainant in the case was a faculty at university, of which Patel and the two other accused were office bearers.
The court of Justice Gita Gopi, while quashing the complaint and FIR, reasoned that a plain reading of the complaint shows that “it misses out on specifics” and that the complainant “has not given any particulars or details as to when the alleged instances of harassment had taken place.”
“The allegations made in the impugned complaint appear to be general in nature and unspecific. In fact, it appears that the issue relates to some internal political rivalry between different factions of the University as the complainant has narrated about events as to how a particular individual was restricted from becoming a member of the Executive Committee / Search Committee of Vice Chancellor of the University…this court is of the opinion (that)…complaint… is a clear misuse and abuse of the process of law,” the court noted.
The woman in November 2017 had filed a complaint against three accused, alleging that in 2016, some TV news channels reported a news item in which some scandalous remarks were made against her and her PhD guide.
It was also alleged that some posters were pasted in the premises of the university portraying that the complainant and her PhD guide were involved in “an illicit relationship.”
It was also alleged that “to scuttle the journey of her PhD guide as the Vice Chancellor of Gujarat University,” the accused used the complainant “as a medium so as to harm his reputation.”
While initially the complaint was filed under Sections 500 and 120B of IPC (criminal defamation and criminal conspiracy), the complainant being aggrieved by the non-addition of certain sections, had moved the Gujarat HC earlier, seeking transfer of investigation to DSP Patan.
Following a court order, and investigation by the DSP Patan, a complaint was then registered under Sections 354(A)(1)(iv), 469, 504, 506, 500, 509 and 120B of IPC against the three accused, including the Patan MLA.
As recorded in the court’s order, the university had also constituted a committee to inquire into the allegations made by the complainant and upon an inquiry, the committee submitted its report to the vice-chancellor of the University opining that the computers had no history of downloads or any objectionable material of the posters, referred to by the complainant.
The computers were also examined by FSL and the Directorate of Forensic Science, Gujarat opined that “no incriminating material was found in the said computers.”
📣 The Indian Express is now on Telegram. Click here to join our channel (@indianexpress) and stay updated with the latest headlines
- The Indian Express website has been rated GREEN for its credibility and trustworthiness by Newsguard, a global service that rates news sources for their journalistic standards.